Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
VegasHockey

Byonic patented universal skate blades

Recommended Posts

Interesting.  I wonder if the altered geometry required to accommodate both holders actually lets them get past the existing patents?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BenBreeg said:

So how are they getting past any IP issues?

If they made a holder that took this blade, would they be able to?

"Oh yeah our system just happens to take a blade that works in both of these other holders"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, BenBreeg said:

So how are they getting past any IP issues?

My first question would be how they got their design patented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, boo10 said:

Interesting.  I wonder if the altered geometry required to accommodate both holders actually lets them get past the existing patents?

I would guess that it does.    They probably got a utility patent on it the same way Bladetech did on their design which would allow them to manufacture and sell it without any concerns from Bauer

1 hour ago, flip12 said:

Does it also fit the True Shift holder?

No.  True's design is very different.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/5/2020 at 8:13 AM, puckstopper said:

I would guess that it does.    They probably got a utility patent on it the same way Bladetech did on their design which would allow them to manufacture and sell it without any concerns from Bauer

No.  True's design is very different.

 

An utility patent would mean that there's another function other than that it attaches to a holder. 

Bauer's main language around their patent was that the upper geometry of the runner was the patent. 

Perhaps I'll reach out to Nick for further clarification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, JR Boucicaut said:

An utility patent would mean that there's another function other than that it attaches to a holder. 

Bauer's main language around their patent was that the upper geometry of the runner was the patent. 

Perhaps I'll reach out to Nick for further clarification.

I believe they can claim theoretical utility in the ability to move a set of blades from one brand of holder to another.  We all know it's a bit of a stretch, but the theory that there are people  who have interest in this function might be enough to allow them to skirt Bauer's patent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to see it up close to see that both holders fully secure the runner.  But IMO if you have an XS holder just get Step, and if the LS Edge just get Pulse TI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After having taken a closer look at the video, I don't think I'd use those on XS holders.  The depth of the slot for the retaining screw is miniscule. I could see 1/2 turn of the dial being enough to let the runner pop out pretty easily on impact.  (This is assuming that I am correctly identifying the retention slot).

Edited by boo10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I’m missing the point but this seems like 98% benefit to a retailer, and 2% to consumer. 
 

realistically how many people want this steel, and also routinely switch skates between brands?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Buzz_LightBeer said:

Maybe I’m missing the point but this seems like 98% benefit to a retailer, and 2% to consumer. 
 

realistically how many people want this steel, and also routinely switch skates between brands?

It also means less SKUs and therefor optimized production for the manufacturer which might lead to lower prices for the consumer. Definitely benefits retailer in purchasing, but with that also the consumer in availability. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Buzz_LightBeer said:

Maybe I’m missing the point but this seems like 98% benefit to a retailer, and 2% to consumer. 
 

realistically how many people want this steel, and also routinely switch skates between brands?

Well it gives the consumer the freedom to switch skate brands without thinking about the added aftermarket blades cost. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...