Davideo
-
Content Count
227 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2 -
Feedback
0%
Posts posted by Davideo
-
-
Like nearly every decision in life, it's a cost-benefit analysis. And "cost" meaning the negative aspects, not the monetary price.
For example, I always play with a full cage. I got used to it playing over the past 30 years so the cost is relatively low to me. And the benefit is quite large. I get hit with a stray stick or puck or something at least a couple of times a season, so probably every couple years I'd be needing to get stitched up or visit the dentist. So low cost - pretty high benefit, to me personally, of wearing a full cage, so I do.
The benefit of very protective shoulder pads (high end) is not much more to me than lighter, more mobile pads. Random cross checks, collisions, deflected pucks, etc. are handled slightly better by nicer shoulder pads, but typically only marginally so. And so usually the improvement is a smaller bruise. I do find the cost of mobile shoulder pads to be relatively low and well worth the benefit they provide over nothing. But the cost-benefit of moving up to more protective ones is not generally worth it, to me personally.
I do make an exception for certain games/tournaments that have a higher number of let's call them "aggressive drunkards". I do wear high end shoulder pads for those games. And the only moderate to serious torso injuries I've experienced as an adult were in these games, while wearing good shoulder pads: a cross check to the spine between the shoulder pads and pants that hurt for a couple months, and a cracked rib when a player suddenly decided checking should be allowed.
If I really wanted to minimize my chance of injury as much as possible, I'd just stay home.
-
1
-
-
On 7/14/2020 at 1:10 PM, stick9 said:Will the shells be 3D printed like in the promo shots....
Yeah, that was my first thought...
-
1 hour ago, Hills said:Thigh rise stops knees from getting destroyed. Remove those and you have to increase the allowed knee pad sizes to Giguere sizes which people complained about for being too big...
Eh, you can still get hit on the knee with thigh rises depending on how your leg is angled, hence the usage of knee pads currently. And beefy knee pads are still much smaller than the average thigh rise. I do find it interesting that thigh boards were made illegal, but a a thigh rise is perfectly fine.
-
I would eliminate thigh rises on leg pads. I've never heard any reasonable protection justification for them, rather simply to block pucks. Until I tore my groin I played goalie some and had old pads with no thigh rise and when I tried some pads with just a modest +2" thigh rise the difference was noticeable. Much easier to close the 5 hole and block pucks low, inside the post.
-
As one anecdotal data point, I had a pair of shin pads develop a small crack in the knee. I assumed the crack would expand, but went another half a dozen seasons without expanding. So it's possible that it does not get worse.
-
They were very hot as I recall as well.
-
Base might be the only company actively manufacturing tapered blades. If you don't need tapered then you have a lot more options. I still use 2-piece sticks, but regular shafts and blades.
-
Just now, Sniper9 said:Yes and no.. because the facings on his skates wrap so we'll, technically the wrap itself reduces volume. For example true skates. They wrap so we'll it removes all neg space.
The crease on his skates could just be from wear and tear and break down. He uses pretty old model skates that are probably tech mesh. That said older skates didn't wrap and mould as well so volume was pretty specific, hence the three diff fit lines.
Who knows though. He could also be the type who over bakes his skates to get them super pliable and uses them for a short period of time as well which might be the reason why it's creasing/premature break down.
Or he actually likes wearing skates that have extra volume... Which to me is a bit odd since he tire them up pretty tight.
To be clearer, I should have said he *had* a lot of volume in his skates. It of course is eliminated when he tightens them. But as far as a portion of his foot sticking out of the skate and failing the pencil test, I would imagine he would ace that because he has so much wrap.
-
1
-
-
Skate tongues are typically pretty pliable and form to the shape of your shin. I wouldn't think a V versus a U would make much of a difference.
-
1
-
-
On 2/21/2020 at 2:34 PM, start_today said:Part of the problem with “skates should fit X sizes down from your street shoe” is that we can’t know how people’s street shoes fit them. Given the wild sizing inaccuracies you see in hockey skates, I can’t imagine the discrepancies in shoes, seeing as they are softer and more forgiving and even easier to wear too large or small.
Ding, ding, ding, winner! Depending on brand and use case, I vary a full size in street shoes. I've also seen people insist they are a particular shoe size and then use a brannock device (metal shoe sizer) and they were off by 2 sizes, typically smaller then they think.
-
3 hours ago, SirJW said:It doesn't look like Kovalchuk passes the pencil test. Also note the bend in the ankle per another topic.
See link.
I'm confused. Wouldn't he ace the pencil test? The eyelets on the two sides of the skate are very close together indicating that he has a lot of volume in his skate?
-
If you want a curve with good retail availability, I agree the 88 would definitely be the closest fit.
As someone coming from mid-90's Tacks skates: Ribcores and skip the top eyelet was my solution. I initially tried some RBZ's, but the fit wasn't great and felt very stiff. I know some older guys who like Grafs as well, but I don't have any personal experience. Proper fit is definitely the most important parameter though.
The reality is also that you will just need to get used to newer equipment. I would imagine that you will adapt pretty quickly. For kicks, I used an old aluminum shaft with a wood blade that I used 20 years ago. It was terrible, but at the time I thought it worked very well.
-
On 2/15/2020 at 10:04 AM, sickwilly said:The toe of my almost new True 6.0 blade chipped and is starting to split after very little use... maybe 3-4 shinny sessions. I tape over the end of the blade to protect it. I don’t remember anything happening that should have damaged the blade that way (though you can never know for sure).
I’m afraid that the durability of the blade looks like it’s going to be garbage. I wouldn’t buy another True blade.
Do you know which model/generation it was? Previous TRUE blades had issues with breaking near where it mates against the shaft, but have not heard of issues more recently and never with splitting or chipping.
-
5 hours ago, z1ggy said:One of my company's factories in China is back up at 60% capacity. Word (or hope, rather) is back to 100% within the next few weeks.... we'll see.
The factories we work with are not up and running yet. Workers not coming back after Chinese New Year can already be a problem, rumors are that factories may be short staffed for a while.
-
8 minutes ago, JimmyTheDriver said:Here is where I get stuck - there is no negative space. When tied up, they are truly the most form fitting skates I've ever worn, including Makos. If that little lace facia break down (if thats what it is) didnt occur, they are the best skates I've ever owned.
Everything else chews up the top of my foot, or rubs my "accessory navicular" above my arch.
Damn it.
If you compare how close the two sides of the skate are compared to a more "normal" fitting skate you will see that yours are much closer together. This isn't necessarily a problem, but I'm guessing is what is leading to the creasing.
-
I'll second CCM Tacks.
-
3 hours ago, Cavs019 said:They look like they have way too much volume for your foot and are too wide - based on how far around your forefoot those eyelets are wrapping.
I imagine all the negative space is then causing the boot to crease as shown in the pictures as the material tries to make its way back to your foot once you tighten the skate.
Agreed. Though if the width is ok, and it is just a volume problem, i.e. your foot is too thin, you might try putting a piece a felt or something on the bottom of the tongue to decrease negative space. It's not the ideal fix, but could work.
-
13 hours ago, Cavs019 said:I might bite the bullet and order a pair. Has anyone tried them yet - particularly the blades?
2 piece sticks 4 lyfe.
Extensively, and as a lifelong 2 piece user have some points of comparison. I find performance to be better than any other blades I've used previously, and it pairs very well with the TRUE shaft. The biggest difference in what I've experienced is that other blades go soft and the TRUE blades do not. That being said, I have had two basically shear at the hosel and break off. One happened on the second skate, the other was probably after 15-20. The others have actually been very durable and last upwards of perhaps 100 skates. I would estimate other blades (I've used Warrior more recently) start breaking down after maybe not even 50 skates, and are pretty well shot as I approach 75.
There have also been a few versions of the blades and each one seems to advertise improved durability, so perhaps the hosel breakage is no longer an issue. And the last time it happened was on a blade probably two generations back.
I did have to switch from a PM9 type curve to an 88 in making the switch to TRUE. But that may have been for the better overall. I feel my shot is slightly improved and with very little impact to passing or backhands. RIP Modano curve
2 piece sticks 4 lyfe.
-
On 1/23/2020 at 11:43 PM, Sniper9 said:This is a standard shaft but low kick? Always thought the taper was what produced the low kick
It's a "variable" flex shaft. Here is their marketing speak for their "Smart Flex Technology": "Our composite design technology offers an optimized, varied stiffness distribution throughout the shaft."
There are ways to adjust the flex point besides taper.
-
I feel the performance is very good for what works out to a $150 stick. And I rarely break shafts, but do go through blades more quickly. So yes, the economics of a $50 replacement blade are much better.
I also switched from a PM9 curve a few years ago as they were becoming more scarce and it was easier and less expensive to try a few different curves.
-
Ah, looks like they are switching to the new AX9 and I'm guessing they pulled down the old line from their site and haven't put up the new one yet. Thanks. I was starting to panic a bit...
-
Does anyone know if TRUE is discontinuing their blades and shafts? The direct link to the relevant page on their site is still active: https://www.true-hockey.com/true-products/sticks/shafts-blades. However, I can no longer find a way to navigate to it from their home page.
I ask because if they are, I need to seriously stock up.
-
It seems that 25 likely have stepped up in the neutral zone to break up the pass, but as he would also have to change direction it would be a bit risky as he likely couldn't have cleanly intercepted the puck and there is a reasonable chance the winger can pick it up and go in 2 on 1. I'm guessing it would have successfully broken up the play, but given the somewhat lower intensity of the game in general, it isn't surprising the move isn't made.
25 being too late to turn is the only clear "error" in my opinion. A second earlier and he could drive the forward behind the net or at least to a sharp angle, poor percentage shot with no opportunity to cut in front of the net. The forward didn't make much of a move, just blew past the D. That being said, I've seen much worse D performance...
-
It's been about 6 years since the last shaft review, so I figured one was due.
Background: I have played hockey for nearly 30 years, topping out as an ACHA club player and now just in pickup/adult league. As someone who breaks blades but very rarely breaks a shaft using a two piece makes more sense to me. It is also much easier/cheaper to experiment with different curves.
I have not tried any Base shafts but starting from Easton aluminum's have used quite a few different shafts from a number of manufacturers. The performance and feel of a shaft is obviously strongly correlated with the blade being used. I've used a few, but settled on using a TRUE blade as well as that seemed to have the best overall feel and performance. Though in general I think my comments hold if using different blades.
Specs: TRUE 6.0 ABP Shaft - Flex 75
Usage: ~2 Seasons and still going strong (I have been told that differences with the latest version are minor to non-existent).
Weight: I've never been one to pay all to much attention (see usage of Easton aluminum shafts 20 years ago...) but it compares well to other higher end sticks. Total weight of course matters greatly which blade you put on.
Performance: I'm mostly of the opinion that once you get to around the mid-range of sticks there isn't much difference going higher in price, and things like flex, feel, weight, balance, etc. become more important. It is definitely the highest performing shaft I have used. Flex profile can be very specific to the individual, but the flex profile works very well for me. It is advertised as a variable kick point and works quite well across the board: passing, wrist shot, snap shot, slap shot, one timer, etc. I broke a blade the other day and had to switch to my backup with a Bauer shaft. The difference in flex and feel were very noticeable, and much worse.
Durability: I've used the shaft for almost 2 seasons now, which I would estimate to be about 200 hours of ice time. It has some scuffs, scapes, and dings, but nothing that seems to be affecting things in any way.
With the exception of Base, it seems most equipment manufacturers have either stopped manufacturing shafts or at least stopped caring about putting out the best product possible. In my opinion, TRUE does still care and puts out a top-notch product. I know the market is quite small, but I'm very glad that they do. Before I found the TRUE shaft I had started trying some one pieces thinking I'd have to make the switch as they were much better than the shafts I was using, but the TRUE shaft changed that for me and I personally don't think I would gain much by using more expensive one pieces.
So what makes shoulder pads more protective?
in Ice Hockey Equipment
Posted · Report reply
Agree on all counts. Though with regards to dispersion, in a non-check game, force directly to the shoulder seems pretty rare. I find the flatter caps annoying because they can shift on me, but I don't know that I can think of a time I had a strong force directly to the shoulder where improved dispersion would have been advantageous.