rafalksi = sakic?

[kyjorgen 0]

i've been reading old posts researching an acceptable mission curve(i want to pick up a fuel ops) and most people say the sakic and rafalski are identical, however i came across a post that says that the curves are the same, but the rafalski is less open at the toe. i like the sakic, but that toe is just too open for me. could someone with first hand experience clarify this for me? thanks

[hockeytim18 0]

I just matched up my easton sakic and mission rafalski. Same curve. I'm pretty sure they are the same. My tape job could be bad but they look like the same to me.

[hockeymom 2]

I can't say because I have never taken that close of a look at these two blades, but I've found the pattern database to be accurate here.

It indicates the Rafalski would be a bit more closed compared to the Sakic; describing the face angle of the Ralfalski to be "slightly open" and the Sakic as "open"

[Chadd 916]

I can't say because I have never taken that close of a look at these two blades, but I've found the pattern database to be accurate here.

It indicates the Rafalski would be a bit more closed compared to the Sakic; describing the face angle of the Ralfalski to be "slightly open" and the Sakic as "open"

That's an error, they are virtually identical.

[kovalchuk71 212]

kinda off topic, but are there any blades like the sakic, but a tad bit more closed?

[Chadd 916]

kinda off topic, but are there any blades like the sakic, but a tad bit more closed?

Hard to say when you use exacting terms like "a tad"

[kovalchuk71 212]

ok, I dont know how to explain it. Just a sakic curve that is closed more than the retail, but still has some loft.

[hockeymom 2]

I can't say because I have never taken that close of a look at these two blades, but I've found the pattern database to be accurate here. 

It indicates the Rafalski would be a bit more closed compared to the Sakic; describing the face angle of the Ralfalski to be "slightly open" and the Sakic as "open"

That's an error, they are virtually identical.

Oh man... what a week on MSH... first a virus attack and then an error in the pattern database. What is the world coming to?!

Thanks for clearing that up Chadd.

[Chadd 916]

I can't say because I have never taken that close of a look at these two blades, but I've found the pattern database to be accurate here. 

It indicates the Rafalski would be a bit more closed compared to the Sakic; describing the face angle of the Ralfalski to be "slightly open" and the Sakic as "open"

That's an error, they are virtually identical.

Oh man... what a week on MSH... first a virus attack and then an error in the pattern database. What is the world coming to?!

Thanks for clearing that up Chadd.

Honesty isn't always good for the ego. It was most likely just a typo when we put it in.