JR Boucicaut 3801 Report post Posted November 8, 2012 Hey guys,We're looking for a LTR skate reviewer.Requirements -Must have submitted a total of 3 reviews on MSHMust be able to wear a mid-line skate; list examples of what model skates you wearPlease send an email to admin@modsquadhockey.com with a short paragraph explaining why you would be a good tester.You must agree to post every time you use the product, including initial impressions. Failure to do so will result in a call tag for the product to be returned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sharks25 9 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 If I wasn't so in love with my one100s I would definitely submit an application. Hopefully you guys find a good reviewer, I'm sure you will :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BucksAway 16 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 wow this would be a cool job Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CommodoreColt 19 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 Nnngh. No reviews under my belt, as everything I've skated on, shot with, or wore was new old stock on clearance and irrelevant for review. Shame because I'm a small, light dude but a decent skater, making mid-tier skates my premium comfort zone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
moejoe3117 1 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 First of all, what brand, and high end down to low end. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR Boucicaut 3801 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 First of all, what brand, and high end down to low end.Huh?Nnngh. No reviews under my belt, as everything I've skated on, shot with, or wore was new old stock on clearance and irrelevant for review. Shame because I'm a small, light dude but a decent skater, making mid-tier skates my premium comfort zone.Old stock does not mean irrelevant for review. Especially when you can chart the progress of a type of product that has evolved into a newer model. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CommodoreColt 19 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 Old stock does not mean irrelevant for review. Especially when you can chart the progress of a type of product that has evolved into a newer model.That's good to hear, glad to hear that people would find reviews of old stock helpful. Thanks JR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fatwabbit 93 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 Assume we mean posted reviews? I've submitted some in the last few months, not sure if they actually got approved for viewing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR Boucicaut 3801 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 Check and see if they are there. When I reject a review, I always tell them why and ask for a revision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreww 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2012 Shooting over an inquiry this evening. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR Boucicaut 3801 Report post Posted November 10, 2012 Guys, I hate to say it, but if you do not meet the requirements (especially the 3 review thing) don't bother applying.Pretty much all of the responses I have gotten so far say how deserving of it they are despite the fact that they haven't submitted a review. Think of reviews as your portfolio. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreww 0 Report post Posted November 10, 2012 Why rule out the candidates with complete competency to structure the reviews? I'd have no issue providing examples.There's not many pages of LTR's. Why not just flip through them and hand select your candidates in this case? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sharks25 9 Report post Posted November 10, 2012 Dude, it's simple: Submit 3 reviews on products that you've used. There the proof that your competent to structure the review correctly. It's not that hard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR Boucicaut 3801 Report post Posted November 11, 2012 Why rule out the candidates with complete competency to structure the reviews? I'd have no issue providing examples.If you didn't have an issue, you'd have at least 3 reviews up.There's not many pages of LTR's. Why not just flip through them and hand select your candidates in this case?Then the same people would be doing them, and you would never have a chance.It's pretty cut and dry; you contribute first, and you then get rewarded. It doesn't work the other way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
henryb 4 Report post Posted November 11, 2012 Will be sending in a couple of reviews, now that I have one that was approved on the RX:60's. I will follow with the same format. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreww 0 Report post Posted November 11, 2012 If you didn't have an issue, you'd have at least 3 reviews up.Then the same people would be doing them, and you would never have a chance.It's pretty cut and dry; you contribute first, and you then get rewarded. It doesn't work the other way.Yeah, oh well.Good luck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sharks25 9 Report post Posted November 12, 2012 I sent you a PM, JR :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR Boucicaut 3801 Report post Posted November 12, 2012 Please send an email to admin@modsquadhockey.com with a short paragraph explaining why you would be a good tester.I sent you a PM, JR :):( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sharks25 9 Report post Posted November 12, 2012 I don't know how I missed that. I just added some more info about myself and emailed it to said address. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kyle Friedman 9 Report post Posted November 12, 2012 Sent in an application the other day, would love to do a LTR! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
