Int. Typhoon vs. Int. Cyclone

[Neo5370 132]

Looking at trying out a 70ish flex shaft. Other than weight and price is the Typhoon that much worse than the Cyclone?

I searched and found one person who liked both but am looking for other opinions.

[Project_2501 0]

I think that the Typhoon would be better. The cyclone has a really, really slim diameter shaft.

I hated my cyclone.

[jjtt99 0]

The cyclone was designed with women in mind -- that's why the diameter of the shaft is less than usual.

[Project_2501 0]

And that's mainly why I hated it so much...

[forbs02 20]

I had a 70 flex Cyclone once upon a time. It was the stiffest shaft ever. I've had other people lean on it a little and it has absolutely no give. I hated it. Its my pond stick now.

[DamnLocust 0]

I had the orignal aluminum cyclone back in the day, and had a 95 flex composite one as well. my favorite shafts of all time. I actually likes the thin grip of it. The only reason I didn't get another one is that I currently have 4 shafts and a one piece, with 3 more OPS on the way. And I still want to pick up another Cyclone.

I think an intermediate typhoon (was 75 flex, will probably be 65 flex now) would be a bit shorter than a cyclone. the Cyclone is standard senior length, even though it's a 70 flex. you could also go for a Sr. Typhoon in 80 flex. Also, with Easton making 75 flex senior OPS, they may do the same with their Sr. shafts as well.

Actually I just remembered that I have a 70 flex cyclone that I had got from someone, but it was cut down a bit. No good for me as it's too whippy. pm me if you're interested, I'll let it go cheap.

[Project_2501 0]

You want a cyclone? Lol, I have a 95 flex one that's uncut sitting here that I will never use again.

[DamnLocust 0]

pm sent