

Miller55
-
Content Count
853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
26 -
Feedback
N/A
Posts posted by Miller55
-
-
13 minutes ago, ThisisBen said:Thanks for the responses!
Is the 30 day satisfaction guarantee still a thing or did it end in December? I'd give both sizes a go if that was the case.
Not sure about that sorry
-
-
12 hours ago, ThisisBen said:Hi! Long time lurker, first time poster.
Figured this was the best thread for my inquiry and better than starting a new question thread.
I have wide feet and a very high instep. I currently wear Nexus 7000's in 7EE but they are on their way out and don't fit me very well anymore after having lost a bunch of weight. Also, my left foot is slightly skinnier than my right.
I tried the TF7's the other day in 6.5R, 6.5W, and 6W.
6.5R felt quite tight in the fore/mid foot(not painfully, just uncomfortably, especially my right foot), tight in the heel, and the volume was quite shallow(I barely pass the pencil test on my Nexus EE's). Didn't try them baked.
6.5W felt very roomy in the fore/mid foot(especially my left), decent heel lock on my right foot but too lose on my left, and the volume was much better(I may just barely fail if I did the pencil test). Tried them baked and the fit didn't change very much(I think the employee didn't heat them long enough).
6W probably felt the best over all but still had issues. Slightly tighter than the 6.5W in the fore/mid foot(though my left was still looser than my right), slightly tighter in the heel(left heel still couldn't lock in though), and the volume felt the same is the 6.5W. Didn't try them baked as I had to go back to work.
Based on your experiences, which of the sizes had the best fit for me? Would baking the 6.5W(and 6W)for a longer time than the store did produce better results? Would they be able to "shrink" and hug my fore/mid foot better if I did the wrap method on it the same way the heels would? Would my left heel be able to lock in with the wrap method?
Or, were the 6.5R's the best fit for me? If I got them baked appropriately, would they have loosened up and felt much better and looser over all? Would baking them increase the volume of the skate somehow?
Thanks in advance!
I would go 6W as they will open up a bit with use. Also, if volume is an issue, you can easily swap out the current tongues for the thinner pro tongues which will help relieve that pressure. Good luck
-
12 hours ago, ThisisBen said:Hi! Long time lurker, first time poster.
Figured this was the best thread for my inquiry and better than starting a new question thread.
I have wide feet and a very high instep. I currently wear Nexus 7000's in 7EE but they are on their way out and don't fit me very well anymore after having lost a bunch of weight. Also, my left foot is slightly skinnier than my right.
I tried the TF7's the other day in 6.5R, 6.5W, and 6W.
6.5R felt quite tight in the fore/mid foot(not painfully, just uncomfortably, especially my right foot), tight in the heel, and the volume was quite shallow(I barely pass the pencil test on my Nexus EE's). Didn't try them baked.
6.5W felt very roomy in the fore/mid foot(especially my left), decent heel lock on my right foot but too lose on my left, and the volume was much better(I may just barely fail if I did the pencil test). Tried them baked and the fit didn't change very much(I think the employee didn't heat them long enough).
6W probably felt the best over all but still had issues. Slightly tighter than the 6.5W in the fore/mid foot(though my left was still looser than my right), slightly tighter in the heel(left heel still couldn't lock in though), and the volume felt the same is the 6.5W. Didn't try them baked as I had to go back to work.
Based on your experiences, which of the sizes had the best fit for me? Would baking the 6.5W(and 6W)for a longer time than the store did produce better results? Would they be able to "shrink" and hug my fore/mid foot better if I did the wrap method on it the same way the heels would? Would my left heel be able to lock in with the wrap method?
Or, were the 6.5R's the best fit for me? If I got them baked appropriately, would they have loosened up and felt much better and looser over all? Would baking them increase the volume of the skate somehow?
Thanks in advance!
I would go 6W as they will open up a bit with use. Also, if volume is an issue, you can easily swap out the current tongues for the thinner pro tongues which will help relieve that pressure. Good luck
-
These puppies dropped and look really nice. At that price I'm skeptical of trying Tour given their issues with durability. Anybody give them a go?
https://www.inlinewarehouse.com/Tour_Roller_Hockey_Skates/catpage-TOURSKATE.html
-
They will put them on sale when they hit a certain amount of remaining stock. They did the same with Mission release where the fz were still full price when the wm line dropped.
Personally I don't wear vapors but I'm really baffled by the decision to only offer in fit 2.
-
1
-
-
Wow those are way better looking than hyper lites
-
1
-
-
Well, Bauer rollers are built in the Vapor last and Mission rollers are built on the Supreme last. So size 6 in both would be your most logical bet. I'm assuming you already figured something out, but just putting it here in case
-
1
-
-
Thanks, I guess I'm sticking with a cage then
-
Bumping this as I'm considering going to a bubble. Is there any verdict on which bubble is longer? I have a long face (wear size small helmet or medium on the smallest setting, and size large cage always) and am leaning towards CCM, but just wondering if one is longer than the other
-
You probably already got it but I would back the 85 for concrete as well
-
R1 feel pretty close to standard to me. OK can get really loose and give you a good workout
-
1
-
-
On 2/4/2022 at 10:21 AM, flip12 said:Most 2-pc. elbow buckets are descendants of Jofa’s JDP 2-pc elbows, especially in the cap design. That kind of cap limits range of motion so you can almost, but not quite, fully extend your arms unless you cheat the straps (many people do) and sacrifice their anti-slip fit. 3-pc. elbow buckets don’t have the same degree of hyperextension protection.
100%.
-
I haven't had much by way of fit issues with elbows, but I do prefer a2 piece pad as I find the 3 piece allow me too much mobility and I tend to hyperextend and hurt my elbow. Not sure why but I don't have the issue with 2 piece pads.
-
9 minutes ago, YesLanges said:Sprung and MB
Gotcha. Sprung have great power and grip, they are fast and really maneuverable for all 80s and the grip is excellent. R1 felt to me very slow and clunky, not necessary because it's weight, just the way the work. Grip was better than a regular chassis, but they were slower for sure and the maneuverability was the same. I didn't keep them because I just did not see myself ever using them.
-
5 minutes ago, YesLanges said:How would you describe the difference, if you've tried MBs?
Not sure what you're asking. Difference between what?
-
Personally I would just go with a straight chassis if I didn't have sprungs. Not a fan of the r1
-
49 minutes ago, stick9 said:I had the retail 2s Pro gloves, not the pro stock version. While it's a difficult place to get hit. I was a bit disappointed in the coverage in that area.
To be fair, it wasn't the sole reason why I started looking at other gloves. Gloves tend to feel bulky once they break in. It doesn't help that I need a 14 or my fingers are busting out of the ends.
You probably need a 13 with fingers extended in that case. If you have long fingers but want a tight fitting glove then I think ft1 pro stock is the way to go as the fingers are extended 1/4"I believe
-
1
-
-
50 minutes ago, Hills said:Which pro stocks don't? From my experience the NHL ones are plastic and the NCAA are retail spec.
I have a pair of Kyle Clifford's Kings gloves that have no plastic in the backhand
-
If you ever saw his pro curve you would know he's gotta be a gear nerd lol, but retail skates is great
-
7 minutes ago, Hills said:2S Pro retail protection is okay but not top notch anymore since they removed the plastic inserts and Poron backhand padding. There is a reason the NHL gloves still have the plastic inserts.
No idea about retail I just have pro stocks but not all pro stock even have the plastic.
-
2S pro protection is top notch imo. Not many gloves without custom pinky guard will help you on the side of the hand there. I've taken lasers straight to the backhand and no issue
-
https://sprunghockey.com/shop/
Thom bought the rights to the website, so he actually sells through here now. You save on the fees and tax and he does as well. He doesn't have a7s I don't think. But he does have the rights to production, so maybe reach out and see if he's trying to manufacture some. He told me in the summer that when he sells out he will consider making a new run
-
2
-
-
On 12/28/2021 at 11:29 PM, crispy92 said:Looking at a set of used pro stock ft1’s. I know it’s suggested that ccm fits .5 bigger but is that true with the ft1/ql line? Trying to see if anybody with a set can chime in.
currently in true a6.0 13’s and had 14” franchises
What width were your franchises? 14N and 13W franchises have the same length fingers. Lengthwise, I think if you fit 13s in anything than you will be 13s in CCM pro. But the ft1s are snug. But I think 14 will be long in the fingers
Compression short or pant with garter belt?
in Ice Hockey Equipment
Posted · Report reply
Ya bud, agree with this. Might be time to start manufacturing your own lol.