under armour face protection

[DoublinUp 0]

What makes this visor 90.00 good? i cant imagine buying a 90 dollar visor

http://www.hockeymonkey.com/under-armour-h...visor-apvx.html

[interpathway 9]

Attending the same university these guys (the UA guys) graduated from, I can honestly tell you that the only reason they believe it is 90 USD good are those little black and white logos on it. I can't imagine this visor employing any fabric/sweat-wicking-away specific technology.

[greech 4]

I have one, certainly didn't pay $90 for it though. Optically its OK, I think it is better than some of the Itech offerings but not quite on par with the Oakley stuff.

[DoublinUp 0]

thats what i was thinking...id rather have Oakley when it comes to a quality lens though!!! hmmm

[jrhky36 1]

I have one, certainly didn't pay $90 for it though. Optically its OK, I think it is better than some of the Itech offerings but not quite on par with the Oakley stuff.

HDO-high def optics

[HattrickSwayze 3]

I like how it says it has two great features, APVX and NXT, but no explanation of what they are.

[interpathway 9]

That is because they are abbreviations on a product they shouldn't be manufacturing. UA for your under gear, Oakley for your eyes.

[VakarLajos 5]

I like how it says it has two great features, APVX and NXT, but no explanation of what they are.

that's internet specs for ya.

[brettlynch11 0]

That is because they are abbreviations on a product they shouldn't be manufacturing. UA for your under gear, Oakley for your eyes.

Agree. Can't see much of anything being better than the Oakley Visors.

[calishark28 0]

We're going to be seeing a lot more then just the visor. Soon they'll release a lot more overpriced hockey gear, like shoulder pads and gloves.

[mgoblue 0]

Agree. Can't see much of anything being better than the Oakley Visors.

ZING!

Agreed. Oakley is the cream of the crop as far as I've explored. My Oakley has served me far better than my Itech HS22... and it's orange for chrissakes!