What model Easton is this?

[ekeating 0]

I was looking at these skates on the "Bay" and can't figure out what model Easton they are. They look to be either 1500C or 800C, but there are no markings. The seller says that there is nothing stating what model and the box is from a different skate. They did say they have a pair of 1500Cs and the liner is orange, not grey like this one. I have gone through the catalogs in the download section and can't come up withany determination. Any help would be appreciated.

Mystery Skates

[17D1998 1]

Probably a SMU

[Buzz_LightBeer 973]

Almost resemble first generation Synergies

[Ogie Oglethorpe 14]

Almost resemble first generation Synergies

That's what I was thinking too. Once upon a time I'd bought a pair from Cyclone Taylor that didn't have markings either.... they were the very first batches; can't remember what model that was (1200?). Those were the ones that some folks complained that the top edges would rub your calves raw (in fact, I actually never tied my top few eyelets and it did, in fact, cut thru my socks and cause me to bleed a little; so I sold them).

[ekeating 0]

That's what I was thinking too. Once upon a time I'd bought a pair from Cyclone Taylor that didn't have markings either.... they were the very first batches; can't remember what model that was (1200?). Those were the ones that some folks complained that the top edges would rub your calves raw (in fact, I actually never tied my top few eyelets and it did, in fact, cut thru my socks and cause me to bleed a little; so I sold them).

Well, that takes care of that! Good price does not justify accidental amputation, thanks everyone.

[DEATHTRON 19]

1300'S?

Zach

[DetroitRedwings94 0]

first gen 1300s, the 1500s were the next generation

[DEATHTRON 19]

Can't forget the 1300c's!

Zach

[ekeating 0]

Can't forget the 1300c's!

Zach

Did these have the rubbing issue like one of the guys said?

[Ogie Oglethorpe 14]

Yeah! That's it - 1300's. The ones I had were the initial releases (1300). They were followed by the 1300c's. I seem to recall the only difference was the graphics (mine didn't say 1300 on them) and the liner (mine didn't have the orange bio-dry stuff).

As for the rubbing issue, some people had the problem, some didn't. I had it, but suspect that had more to do with my not lacing up the top eyelets. I spot heated it with a gun an bent the top out a bit and do recall that helped quite a bit. Light as hell and super protective.

[ekeating 0]

Thanks for the info that changes things. Did they fit like the 800C and 1500Cs?

[Ogie Oglethorpe 14]

Can't comment on the 800, but yes to the 1500

[lassek20 1]

pro stock 1500c synergy's. the pro stock versions didnt say 1500c. i saw a brand new pair w/ ls2 tuuks at the Caps locker room sale during training camp just before pre-season. i almost bought them but i opted for tyler sloan's one95's since i already have a pair of 1500's w/ ls2 tuuks.

[ekeating 0]

pro stock 1500c synergy's. the pro stock versions didnt say 1500c. i saw a brand new pair w/ ls2 tuuks at the Caps locker room sale during training camp just before pre-season. i almost bought them but i opted for tyler sloan's one95's since i already have a pair of 1500's w/ ls2 tuuks.

What are the tell tale signs that they are Pro stock? The lining, logos, lack of model #?

[lassek20 1]

What are the tell tale signs that they are Pro stock? The lining, logos, lack of model #?

the retail ones said "synergy 1500c" rather than just "synergy", the retails also had orange lining at the top. the pro stocks also have thicker felt tongues and a little less glitter on the graphics if im not mistaken