Interesting things I did not know while doing research for skate profiles.

[Beflar 53]

Interesting things I did not know before I started doing research on skate profiles.

If you have good knee bend you can make anything work...(some pros don't even know what they are skating on).

Just because something feels good to you doesn't mean it is the most efficient profile in term of speed and agility.(Brock University study).

Most efficient dual profile was 9/10 and 9.5/10.5 in study.(only dual looked at. Brock University).

Dual profiles greater than 2 ie 7/10 may cause flat spot feel between the different radius in runner,  might be better to keep changes to 2 or less ie 8/10 or 8/10/12/14 etc.(just something being suggested).
 

Edited February 16, 2020 by Beflar

[Larry54 243]

I've noticed that good knee/ankle bend makes pitch less important. I realized that when I started skipping the top 2 eyelets.

[BenBreeg 493]

Where was the data on the flat spot from?  That doesn't make sense.  Transitions betweens different radius curves isn’t rocket science, it is foundational in rail and road design. 

[oldtrainerguy28 478]

3 hours ago, Beflar said:

Interesting things I did not know before I started doing research on skate profiles.

If you have good knee bend you can make anything work...(some pros don't even know what they are skating on).

Just because something feels good to you doesn't mean it is the most efficient profile in term of speed and agility.(Brock University study).

Most efficient dual profile was 9/10 and 9.5/10.5 in study.(only dual looked at. Brock University).

Dual profiles greater than 2 ie 7/10 may cause flat spot in runner,  might be better to keep changes to 2 or less ie 8/10 or 8/10/12/14 etc.(just something being suggested).
 

There was a 7/13 used in the study. Least efficient 

[Beflar 53]

1 hour ago, BenBreeg said:

Where was the data on the flat spot from?  That doesn't make sense.  Transitions betweens different radius curves isn’t rocket science, it is foundational in rail and road design. 

No data.  Just talk about feel, I went back to change the wording in the first post.

Edited February 16, 2020 by Beflar

[Beflar 53]

1 hour ago, oldtrainerguy28 said:

There was a 7/13 used in the study. Least efficient 

That study was interesting.

[VegasHockey 1283]

22 hours ago, Beflar said:

Interesting things I did not know before I started doing research on skate profiles.

If you have good knee bend you can make anything work...(some pros don't even know what they are skating on).

Just because something feels good to you doesn't mean it is the most efficient profile in term of speed and agility.(Brock University study).

Most efficient dual profile was 9/10 and 9.5/10.5 in study.(only dual looked at. Brock University).

Dual profiles greater than 2 ie 7/10 may cause flat spot feel between the different radius in runner,  might be better to keep changes to 2 or less ie 8/10 or 8/10/12/14 etc.(just something being suggested).
 

Is this the study?

https://dr.library.brocku.ca/bitstream/handle/10464/8681/Brock_McGurk_Michael_2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

[BenBreeg 493]

Corrected, no more responding with the flu and 102 fever!

Edited February 17, 2020 by BenBreeg

[oldtrainerguy28 478]

7 hours ago, BenBreeg said:

That is it.

No that's a study on Pitch and what effect negative neutral and forward had in performance 

Different study than the one on profiles.