Leif 161 Report post Posted April 6, 2019 15 hours ago, bunnyman666 said: Yes, that is. That would make sense why nano carbon just isn’t nearly as buzz-worthy as it was ten years back. Possibly not worth the additional cost is the jyst of the short article. Thanks for that. The cynic might conclude that the extra cost, and selling price, don’t make up for the longer lifetime and consequent reduced sales. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bunnyman666 445 Report post Posted April 6, 2019 2 hours ago, Leif said: The cynic might conclude that the extra cost, and selling price, don’t make up for the longer lifetime and consequent reduced sales. You had better believe it! A lifetime product is a terrible thing according to many who make products! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BenBreeg 493 Report post Posted April 6, 2019 2 hours ago, bunnyman666 said: You had better believe it! A lifetime product is a terrible thing according to many who make products! It all comes down to the business case, not cynicism. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bunnyman666 445 Report post Posted April 6, 2019 17 minutes ago, BenBreeg said: It all comes down to the business case, not cynicism. It depends on who you ask. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
