Trooper 8 Report post Posted April 20, 2010 JR didn't make the Eurotrash remark, it was Milburry. Ah, I only saw it once live. Why does that also not surprise me? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mack 44 Report post Posted April 20, 2010 Oh, Miro Satan jokes will never get old.QFBS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
psh 25 Report post Posted April 20, 2010 Re: Miro Satan. I'm sure there are countless examples of this sort of thing, but Miro really needs to spend at least one day on the Devils roster before he retires. Those jerseys would be golden.And Mike Commodore. Come on buddy, throw the geeks a bone and pick up number 64 next year. That would be another prized jersey. There is at least one good thing you can say about Jordin Tootoo. His jersey number 22 is right on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chippa13 1844 Report post Posted April 20, 2010 Possibly one of the only things I liked about Harry Sinden was the fact that he refused to let Steve Heinz wear number 57. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin 5 Report post Posted April 20, 2010 I am a fan of Christine Simpson. She knows her stuff and in her day was hotter than Thompson or Sterner (in my opinion). She still looks great considering she could be the mother of half of the players. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RadioGaGa 162 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 Re: Miro Satan. I'm sure there are countless examples of this sort of thing, but Miro really needs to spend at least one day on the Devils roster before he retires. Those jerseys would be golden.And Mike Commodore. Come on buddy, throw the geeks a bone and pick up number 64 next year. That would be another prized jersey. There is at least one good thing you can say about Jordin Tootoo. His jersey number 22 is right on.As my buddy pointed out...John Erskine wears 4. Think about it for a second...it's mildly amusing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chadd 916 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 The guy who does the interviews on Islanders telecasts (Rob Carlin) after a few soft tosses asked Coach Scott Gordon a follow up question and the guy looked at him and walked off. It would seem that if they asked tougher questions that might happen more often and you would not be able to fill the airtime. BS move as it is, it would be a concern of the media.I saw that one, it was a not just a hard question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyscrape 5 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 As my buddy pointed out...John Erskine wears 4. Think about it for a second...it's mildly amusing.HAHA! 4skine :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BenderHockey 127 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 And Mike Commodore. Come on buddy, throw the geeks a bone and pick up number 64 next year. That would be another prized jersey.HAHA, I've always thought that. Glad to see I'm not the only one who's a bit twisted.I saw that one, it was a not just a hard question.For those who didn't catch it, what was asked, and why was it so troubling to him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chadd 916 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 For those who didn't catch it, what was asked, and why was it so troubling to him?It was something like "Are you ever going to get the powerplay working?" Not those exact words, but it was phrased very aggressively and wasn't appropriate at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BenderHockey 127 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 It was something like "Are you ever going to get the powerplay working?" Not those exact words, but it was phrased very aggressively and wasn't appropriate at all.Shit! That's incredibly ballsy. As inappropriate is it was, you gotta hand it to the guy to even have to stones to ask it on live TV. It's not like you are approaching Reg Dunlop in a bar about the PP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobbyD9 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 The question asked was with reference to the Islanders having lost so many 3rd period leads this year. The question was something to the extent of how do you plan to change the fact that the Isles have been outscored 82-39 in the 3rd period this year. Yes tough question after losing another 3rd period lead, but it was a fair question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fire0nIce228 1 Report post Posted April 21, 2010 Thats exactly the kind of reporting I WANT to hear. Too much cookie cutter questions with cookie cutter answers. Need to liven things up a couple notches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chadd 916 Report post Posted April 22, 2010 The question asked was with reference to the Islanders having lost so many 3rd period leads this year. The question was something to the extent of how do you plan to change the fact that the Isles have been outscored 82-39 in the 3rd period this year. Yes tough question after losing another 3rd period lead, but it was a fair question.That's what it was, but it was still worded very aggressively and not at all appropriate for a quickie post game bit for the local broadcast. There's a middle ground between a softball question and using the coach as a pinata, especially when you're part of the home team broadcast. The way the question was asked implies that the reporter in question has an axe to grind with the coach.Better ways to ask would have been:"why does the team struggle so much in the third period?""how do you fix the third period woes?"etc... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites