Patty WAH, goalie son in a fight... video link

[J-Shera 0]

I don't see how it's naive or knee-jerk. As I said, I firmly believe that fighting belongs in hockey. But, this type of fighting, where people aren't even defending themselves, isn't hockey fighting, that's called bar brawling. A hockey fight is one on one, you punch each other in the face, and one guy falls, or the the linesmen jump in, it's over. If I have a guy pinned up against the boards, and he can't even protect himself, I don't keep on swinging. This isn't the UFC.

As far as the goalies? The RED goalie went way over the line, and the WHITE guy wasn't even willing to step up to the line.

A UFC fight would have been stopped long before any of those fights. So don't try and give MMA a bad name as well please.

[LkptTiger 1]

Surprised no one has questioned the refs in all this. A rather...ineffective...lot if you ask me.

[mack 44]

Kind of naive and knee-jerk reactions to it, but the comedy is escalated when I thought you were from "Placenta."

It's a mess of a fight but it's junior, it happens.

I don't see how it's naive or knee-jerk. As I said, I firmly believe that fighting belongs in hockey. But, this type of fighting, where people aren't even defending themselves, isn't hockey fighting, that's called bar brawling. A hockey fight is one on one, you punch each other in the face, and one guy falls, or the the linesmen jump in, it's over. If I have a guy pinned up against the boards, and he can't even protect himself, I don't keep on swinging. This isn't the UFC.

1) Every single guy on the red team that was on the ice should be banned for life. None of them had any respect for the honor of fighting. Once the guy you are fighting hits the ice, you stop swinging, end of story. At one point in the video I saw, there was one guy pinned up against the boards on the ice, getting haymakers rained on him, with no hope of defending himself. That's just unacceptable.

Lastly, it didn't surprise me that the video was in FRENCH, especially after watching all the guys in WHITE try to fight.

The first part is knee-jerk and naive; the second part is just asshole.

[Justin Liedloff 13]

The first part is knee-jerk and naive; the second part is just asshole.

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying that it's a bit naive and knee jerk to say these guys should be banned for life? I don't see how it's naive or knee jerk. That's the beauty of an opinion, I'm entitled to mine, and you, in turn, are entitled to yours.

And I take it that you're also saying that I'm an ASSHOLE for making the little quip about the French. First, that little gem was added for a select fews' amusement. Second, it's not OK for me to make a joke at the expense of the French, but it's OK for you to quote Iafrate saying that "empty-net goals are for homos" in your signature? A bit of a double standard, don't you think?

[ubitsa 0]

I'm surprised nobody has said it yet....

"AND ANOTHER RIGHT BY ROY, ANOTHER RIGHT BY ROY, ANOTHER RIGHT BY ROY, AN UPPERCUT BY ROY, ANOTHER RIGHT BY ROY, AND ANOTHER RIGHT BY ROY....."

lol

[mack 44]

The first part is knee-jerk and naive; the second part is just asshole.

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying that it's a bit naive and knee jerk to say these guys should be banned for life? I don't see how it's naive or knee jerk. That's the beauty of an opinion, I'm entitled to mine, and you, in turn, are entitled to yours.

And I take it that you're also saying that I'm an ASSHOLE for making the little quip about the French. First, that little gem was added for a select fews' amusement. Second, it's not OK for me to make a joke at the expense of the French, but it's OK for you to quote Iafrate saying that "empty-net goals are for homos" in your signature? A bit of a double standard, don't you think?

Yes, banning everyone on the ice for that fight is knee-jerk and naive. When people have taken baseball swings at people's faces and not been banned for life, this is way down the list of shit I'd ban people for.

Inner monologue issues? Why are such random words capitalized? Anyway, yes, it's an asshole comment (even if you're making it for a select few) because at no point do you hint that it's a joke (one in poor taste and that's coming from me) and it can just turn into an Avery-ish festival of retarded arguments about French people.

And yes, my signature's fine because it's true. ENGs are for homos. If they have a problem with being in my signature, BFD. What are they going to do, redecorate my living room and make catty comments about my wardrobe?

[lotus 2]

And yes, my signature's fine because it's true. ENGs are for homos. If they have a problem with being in my signature, BFD. What are they going to do, redecorate my living room and make catty comments about my wardrobe?

Oh dear god... no matter how hard I try not to laugh, this just gets better every time I read it. :lol:

[LkptTiger 1]

What's Vapor up to nowadays, anyway?

[mack 44]

250-260?

[LkptTiger 1]

It was too easy, really.

[GekigangarIII 0]

Are we sure Roy wasn't goading his son into finding a VCR or some other small appliance to beat up? This is all a misunderstanding.

[chippa13 1844]

Outside of Roy's kid and one other guy on red pounding guys while they're down, it looked like your average line brawl to me. The last shot thrown by Roy's kid on the other goalie was pretty gutless.

[D3nZ 0]

Jonathan just read a statement on tv and you could clearly see he had never seen the statement before reading it. Mumbling his words, making all sorts of mistakes, the Remparts are just trying to get out of a huge hole right now.

[mrusse01 0]

5) not taking his mask off and throwing it at Roy as he skated full speed down the ice

Is that a joke?

Anyways, two Roy's acting like complete dicks, what a surprise.

Jonathan must have learned to fight like that from watching Patrick beat his mom.

[Hidious 0]

Looks like the son just obeyed to his dad's instructions.

[mrusse01 0]

If was someone wanted to fight me and skated the length of the ice to do it, I'd probably just stand there as well and wait for them.

Granted though, I wouldn't just sit there and take an ass kicking from a little bitch like that.

But, if a guy clearly doesn't want to fight you (and has done NOTHING to provoke you at all) then you are a pretty big man going after him in the first place, so the important thing to remember in all this is that Jon Roy is a complete douche bag.

[cxo 0]

so the important thing to remember in all this is that Jon Roy is a complete douche bag.

Quoted for emphasis.

[chippa13 1844]

Looks like the son just obeyed to his dad's instructions.

The way he waved him down the ice, absolutely. That little video on French tv is pretty damning evidence.

[msander 0]

Clearly the Roy cess pool...errr gene pool needs to be cleaned up a touch.

[Justin Liedloff 13]

Yes, banning everyone on the ice for that fight is knee-jerk and naive. When people have taken baseball swings at people's faces and not been banned for life, this is way down the list of shit I'd ban people for.

Inner monologue issues? Why are such random words capitalized? Anyway, yes, it's an asshole comment (even if you're making it for a select few) because at no point do you hint that it's a joke (one in poor taste and that's coming from me) and it can just turn into an Avery-ish festival of retarded arguments about French people.

And yes, my signature's fine because it's true. ENGs are for homos. If they have a problem with being in my signature, BFD. What are they going to do, redecorate my living room and make catty comments about my wardrobe?

Who made you in charge of what I think should happen? Just because you don't agree with what I think, doesn't mean what I think is wrong, naive or knee-jerk.

My personal opinion is that they should be banned (at least the goalie and one other guy who was raining haymakers on a completely defenseless guy), just like Simon should have been banned for his baseball swing / skate stomp incidents, and Perezhogin should have been banned for his baseball swing, and Tony Granato should have been banned for his overhand tomahawk chop. Just because I think they should have been banned, doesn't mean everyone will agree.

Also, just because people have gotten away with some completely brainless acts, doesn't mean they shouldn't have been banned, or that those incidents should be used as the measuring stick for future incidents. I agree that this fight isn't exactly at the top of the list of shit to ban people for, but, for me, it' still on the list.

As for the signature, if it's ok for you to say that empty net goals are for homos, because "it's true," then I can insinuate that the French are pansies, because "it's true."

[bucko 0]

ha ha mr.roy junior is completely crazy! that is great, best scene is when the other player from the white team goes after roy, ha ha young guns boiled to hot:)

[mack 44]

Yes, banning everyone on the ice for that fight is knee-jerk and naive. When people have taken baseball swings at people's faces and not been banned for life, this is way down the list of shit I'd ban people for.

Inner monologue issues? Why are such random words capitalized? Anyway, yes, it's an asshole comment (even if you're making it for a select few) because at no point do you hint that it's a joke (one in poor taste and that's coming from me) and it can just turn into an Avery-ish festival of retarded arguments about French people.

And yes, my signature's fine because it's true. ENGs are for homos. If they have a problem with being in my signature, BFD. What are they going to do, redecorate my living room and make catty comments about my wardrobe?

Who made you in charge of what I think should happen? Just because you don't agree with what I think, doesn't mean what I think is wrong, naive or knee-jerk.

My personal opinion is that they should be banned (at least the goalie and one other guy who was raining haymakers on a completely defenseless guy), just like Simon should have been banned for his baseball swing / skate stomp incidents, and Perezhogin should have been banned for his baseball swing, and Tony Granato should have been banned for his overhand tomahawk chop. Just because I think they should have been banned, doesn't mean everyone will agree.

Also, just because people have gotten away with some completely brainless acts, doesn't mean they shouldn't have been banned, or that those incidents should be used as the measuring stick for future incidents. I agree that this fight isn't exactly at the top of the list of shit to ban people for, but, for me, it' still on the list.

As for the signature, if it's ok for you to say that empty net goals are for homos, because "it's true," then I can insinuate that the French are pansies, because "it's true."

Chromosomal nightmare. Yikes.

[Penguinsfanatic 0]

Yes, banning everyone on the ice for that fight is knee-jerk and naive. When people have taken baseball swings at people's faces and not been banned for life, this is way down the list of shit I'd ban people for.

Inner monologue issues? Why are such random words capitalized? Anyway, yes, it's an asshole comment (even if you're making it for a select few) because at no point do you hint that it's a joke (one in poor taste and that's coming from me) and it can just turn into an Avery-ish festival of retarded arguments about French people.

And yes, my signature's fine because it's true. ENGs are for homos. If they have a problem with being in my signature, BFD. What are they going to do, redecorate my living room and make catty comments about my wardrobe?

Who made you in charge of what I think should happen? Just because you don't agree with what I think, doesn't mean what I think is wrong, naive or knee-jerk.

My personal opinion is that they should be banned (at least the goalie and one other guy who was raining haymakers on a completely defenseless guy), just like Simon should have been banned for his baseball swing / skate stomp incidents, and Perezhogin should have been banned for his baseball swing, and Tony Granato should have been banned for his overhand tomahawk chop. Just because I think they should have been banned, doesn't mean everyone will agree.

Also, just because people have gotten away with some completely brainless acts, doesn't mean they shouldn't have been banned, or that those incidents should be used as the measuring stick for future incidents. I agree that this fight isn't exactly at the top of the list of shit to ban people for, but, for me, it' still on the list.

As for the signature, if it's ok for you to say that empty net goals are for homos, because "it's true," then I can insinuate that the French are pansies, because "it's true."

So i take it you are on of those homos that want to ban fighting in hockey?

[cxo 0]

Of course he is, because it's only homosexuals that want to ban fighting.

This has been one huge digression, let's move on.

[brettlynch11 0]

changing the subject...how sweet would it have been to watch the white goalie beat roys ass after he skated down?

just imagine big roy watching his boy get his ass kicked after sending him down there...that face would have been priceless.

too bad the white goalie didnt do anything like that...