Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

chippa13

2011-2012 Suspension thread

Recommended Posts

There was obviouslly intent to have his 4th line out during that time in the game but flyers could have done something about it

B - If you dont want your top players been injured and you know that the opposing team is out to send a message do the same thing and send out your 4th line although it doesnt prevent a brawl.

Flyers were the away team. They had to put thier line on the ice first, and Bylsma put his 4th line out. He knew what he was doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyers were the away team. They had to put thier line on the ice first, and Bylsma put his 4th line out. He knew what he was doing.

This is pretty much the issue, Laviolette put his better guys out to kill off the late game push he expected and Bylsma basically said "nope, don't care about winning, send out the plugs and let's go headhunting" and Lavy couldn't do anything about it because of last change. Bush league. I don't like either team and thought they both gave as good as they got throughout the tilt but that was pretty lame.

It's going to be a good first round matchup, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three of the five guys on the ice for Pittsburgh had less than 10 minutes of ice time for the game, Asham finished with less than 5 minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody who calls that a flop has objectivity issues where the Pens/Crosby are concerned.....especially when it comes after the whistle.  And yeah Philly just plays pure as the driven snow. :rolleyes:

it wasn't a flop by the traditional definition, but crosby new exactly what he was doing.  after the whistle, crosby went it to bump one of the flyers and then skated off knowing some minor retaliation was coming.  the flyer kid shoves crosby from behind.  crosby knew it was coming but pretended nothing was going and turned his back just waiting for the shove.  he then got up expecting to draw a minor lol  i think the shove truly knocked crosby down as he wasn't looking and was not balanced well for a shove from behind, but he staged the whole thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyers won the faceoff, if they wanted to change they could have. Suspend Crosby for chirping at the coach? Half of both benches were yelling back and forth at coaches and each other. Mountain out of a mole hill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lavy fined $10K, Granato $2500.

Craig Berube was just on Daily News Live on Comcast SportsNet talking about everything, and did not hold back at all when it came to Crosby and Malkin. I didn't get the exact quote, but he said "Crosby and Malkin are the dirtiest players on that team. They slash, hook, punch players in the face after the play, and then whine and cry to the officials when things don't go their way." He then went on to applaud Schenn for taking action on Crosby, because he felt Crosby deserved some retaliation for his numerous uncalled slashes over the course of the game. Couldn't. Agree. More.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Devil's advocate here but a lot of times in hockey the stars will resort to some dirtiness out of frustration for the game in game out guff that they take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Devil's advocate here but a lot of times in hockey the stars will resort to some dirtiness out of frustration for the game in game out guff that they take.

I feel like the Flyers have finally started to figure out a way to get Malkin/Crosby off their game. Get them angry, and they lose focus. They're nowhere near as effective when they're being pushed around, bumped into, things of that nature. Like you said, the stuff that they take causes them to get dirty themselves, and Malkin proved that the last time the Flyers-Pens played. He took an undisciplined penalty in the third period that if I remember correctly resulted in a PP goal for the Flyers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyers won the faceoff, if they wanted to change they could have. Suspend Crosby for chirping at the coach? Half of both benches were yelling back and forth at coaches and each other. Mountain out of a mole hill.

Or Bylsma could not be a dick. It's a bush league move. Suspension-worthy? Not really, but pretty sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bylsma puts his guys out there so someone would hit Schenn, only trying to send a message to the other team that its not okay to cheap shot his players (whether sid "deserved" it or not I'm not getting into). Thats all that happened, then Lavi got pissed that one of his players got hit? Glad to see him get fined, could have injured someone with his little stick incident.

Bylsma could have only put them on the ice to prevent injury of stars such as not wanting Sid or Malkin to get in an altercation, but that seems less likely. To the above poster wetwilly Schenn did get assessed a minor penalty but since the Penguins had scored during the play, he did not have to serve it.

Briere out indefinitely with an upper body contusion for anyone who missed it.

And I do not have a problem with only one game for Quincey, however, I am not familiar with the Ovi hit you are referring to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Devil's advocate here but a lot of times in hockey the stars will resort to some dirtiness out of frustration for the game in game out guff that they take.

Sid was dishing out way more than he was taking in that game. If it was retaliation, it was also escalation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sid was dishing out way more than he was taking in that game. If it was retaliation, it was also escalation.

On SportsCenter today, Crosby said he did more hacking than he's done a in a long time in that game. He also said the Flyers bring out the worst in him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bylsma puts his guys out there so someone would hit Schenn, only trying to send a message to the other team that its not okay to cheap shot his players (whether sid "deserved" it or not I'm not getting into). Thats all that happened, then Lavi got pissed that one of his players got hit? Glad to see him get fined, could have injured someone with his little stick incident.

Bylsma could have only put them on the ice to prevent injury of stars such as not wanting Sid or Malkin to get in an altercation, but that seems less likely. To the above poster wetwilly Schenn did get assessed a minor penalty but since the Penguins had scored during the play, he did not have to serve it.

Briere out indefinitely with an upper body contusion for anyone who missed it.

And I do not have a problem with only one game for Quincey, however, I am not familiar with the Ovi hit you are referring to.

speaking of that play, I didn't understand why Schenn's penalty got wiped out. Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the penalty happened after the goal was scored, so it wasn't a delayed penalty. Didn't make sense to me but maybe I have the timing wrong. The way I remember it, the goal was scored, but play continued. When the play ended, Schenn cross-checked Crosby and a minor penalty was assessed, they went back and awarded the goal. If a penalty happens after a goal, that goal doesn't negate the penalty does it? What am I missing here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

speaking of that play, I didn't understand why Schenn's penalty got wiped out. Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the penalty happened after the goal was scored, so it wasn't a delayed penalty. Didn't make sense to me but maybe I have the timing wrong. The way I remember it, the goal was scored, but play continued. When the play ended, Schenn cross-checked Crosby and a minor penalty was assessed, they went back and awarded the goal. If a penalty happens after a goal, that goal doesn't negate the penalty does it? What am I missing here?

In the past, the penalty would stand. I don't know why it did not in this case. I said the same thing while I was watching the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm understanding correctly, anything after the goal is wiped out if the goal wasn't acknowledged immediately (requiring review).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fraser's column on the TSN site covered that. He said that there was an expected icing whistle coming but that since Schenn's play occurred before the whistle stopped play then the penalty was wiped out by the goal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't know if this would even get looked at because it looks like it is shoulder to shoulder - but i'm sure gunnarsson would like shanaban to look at it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im sure toronto fans will say "but his helmet came off, see it was a blindside headshot"

even though it is gunnarsson's fault for not having a tight helmet strap

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...