Leaderboard

The original picture doesn’t look at all like Pastrnak. You can’t possibly dumb it down, your point was clear from the beginning. The reason I thought it was interesting is there are people who are face blind. Do you often have these switch ups?

Let’s get back on topic.

Let’s get back on topic

Definitely classic Slavic and Scandinavian visages respectively

Not the whole 15% is saved from the steel. It's a combination of changes and advancements.

So it seems there is a small screw that holder the plastic trigger mechanism to the holder. There is no spring like the LS Edge holder so the trigger is plastic tension. Anyway, that little screw, which doesn't really do anything from what I can tell, came out. Used some super glue and screwed it back in and it's good as new.

I don’t think they look alike at all beyond the fact that they’re both athletic white males of approximately the same age (they’re less than a month apart in age, but I didn’t know that before looking it up, and anyone comparing their appearance wouldn’t necessarily know it either). But that description fits a majority of the NHL. Nylander’s got a very LEGO face, so once you’ve recognized him it’s hard to mistake him for someone else. Pastrnak’s got a much longer looking face and a generally goofier game face than Nylander. I could see mixing Pastrnak up with Anze Kopitar if it weren’t for the age difference. Who’s friends with whom? P and N are or you are with P and N?

We think we've worked out all of the details on how to go forward, so if you're interested, please email us at proshop@modsquadhockey.com. As of right now we're looking at a 24-hour turnaround from when we get the steel.

First off, thanks for being patient. We are really close to opening the doors on this. I've had some questions on how we are going to format the reviews. We will be using Prosharp's methodology; what they do is have the skater rate each profile using their 1-5 rating, as posted below: The goal here is to get a balance between the 4 categories. You will fill the slots as you test the profile. So for instance, there's probably no way for you to get a 5 on mobility and a 5 on stability, but certainly you can get a healthy average between the two on the right profile. Profile 1 will be your control set. You will rate that first. If you know the profile, write it in. If the skates haven't been profiled, just write the model and put "stock" next to it. The tester will have their own topic, which they will start. You'll describe what you feel on each profile and then rate the 4 categories as you go along. I recommend doing it as soon as you get a good feel on them, and just making a post every time. Hopefully towards the end we will be able to determine how you got to your preferred profile. I do realize that there are times that people want a certain category over others. As in, you may feel that you may need more stability, so your focus is on that. Try not to think that way. Rate each profile on its own merit. You may find out that a healthy mix may be better than bleeding-edge.

Restructured the section by radius type. So, instead of making one massive post, you will break down your posts by profile type and your username. So, for example: Quad 1 - JR Boucicaut would be the title of the thread that you create. Any additional comments relating to that profile will go into that thread. Typically with reviews, we only allow the user to post, and not allow responses from others. We will allow responses from others and give the testers the opportunity to answer them.