mack 44 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 We called that "the bitch goal." Easy ways to score pre-one timer were the crappy "wraparounds" and passing it straight on-net. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eazy_b97 1 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 I didn't know about the pass on net, but I did know about the wrap around. I remember playing with friends and not allowing goals where the player comes out from below the circles on any goal. I loved it when the goalie would get "stuck" on the one side of the net if you stopped behind the net a few times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mack 44 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 Yup, it wasn't that rare to skate up with a tendy and pass it on in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chadd 916 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 We called that "the bitch goal." Easy ways to score pre-one timer were the crappy "wraparounds" and passing it straight on-net. The dreaded five hole pass. If you were dead center in the middle of the ice it was in 90% of the time with the better players. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR Boucicaut 3802 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 Used to love to take Gartner up the wing, do a Gretzky curl and shoot it into the far corner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warrior37 0 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 i dont remember the year but steve larmer was a stud, jarri kurri was also one of my guns in the sega era Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mack 44 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 Steve Larmer was a stud every year for some odd reason.Courtnall-Ronning-Bure was just unstoppable in those games though, even if they had Jyrki friggin' Lumme on D. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chadd 916 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 Dave Manson was pretty much unstoppable one year too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hooah4 12 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 Yzerman was a beast from 92-95 w/EA. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gongshow11 1 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 in 95 theo fleury was unstoppable with the flames, and bure was a 99 rating throught his EA NHL career. Tim chevaldae was a nasty goalie too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletch 219 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 On a related note, my friend did all of the player ratings for NHL 2K6 (not the roster update though) and now that he is a full time employee of Visual Concepts/Take 2 Interactive he will be doing the ratings and all roster updates for NHL 2K7. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mack 44 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 in 95 theo fleury was unstoppable with the flames, and bure was a 99 rating throught his EA NHL career. Tim chevaldae was a nasty goalie too No, he was around the 90 mark. 99 wasn't a rating they gave out often. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eazy_b97 1 Report post Posted April 5, 2006 Lemieux is the only one I can think of who was a 99 in the early-mid 90s. I don't remember Gretzky's ratings at all. I think Roenick was around a 93-ish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim A 4 Report post Posted April 6, 2006 NHL 94 I think had 2 players that would just take over a game -Nelson Emerson -Bryan Smolinskialso they would skew the points..so if you were putting up 10-15pts per game all of a sudden Smolinksi would be way ahead of you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mack 44 Report post Posted April 6, 2006 Lemieux is the only one I can think of who was a 99 in the early-mid 90s. I don't remember Gretzky's ratings at all. I think Roenick was around a 93-ish. In 94 Fedorov was the only 99 in the game and I think Lemieux was the closest at around 93-94. Yzerman was up there, but a lot of the ratings were skewed. I remember Sakic was in the mid-80s but had like 50 speed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Langenbrunner15 0 Report post Posted April 7, 2006 On a related note, my friend did all of the player ratings for NHL 2K6 (not the roster update though) and now that he is a full time employee of Visual Concepts/Take 2 Interactive he will be doing the ratings and all roster updates for NHL 2K7. :) If NHL 07 doesn't show up even close the being good, im going to the 2K series, EA is a joke with the hockey games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletch 219 Report post Posted April 7, 2006 On a related note, my friend did all of the player ratings for NHL 2K6 (not the roster update though) and now that he is a full time employee of Visual Concepts/Take 2 Interactive he will be doing the ratings and all roster updates for NHL 2K7. :) If NHL 07 doesn't show up even close the being good, im going to the 2K series, EA is a joke with the hockey games. Yes, they are. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pantherfan 0 Report post Posted April 8, 2006 I prefer the 2K series i think some stats must just be made up though becuase on NHL 2K5 there must be 25 different attributes per player and about 750 players in the league and 150 Free agents and all the minor league affiliates all addes up to well over 1000+ and i dont really think they would do (roughly!)25,000 individual attribute stats properly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mickz 107 Report post Posted April 8, 2006 In NHL 98 Pavel Bure only had 3/4 of his bar filled up. I'm assuming that means he's 75%? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites