If I had a dollar for every person that quoted VT ratings... I appreciate what VT is doing, however they need to refine their testing process more.
Too many times, I have had parents “explain” to me what is the ideal helmet for their kids, quoting VT ratings. They push for a helmet that doesn't fit the player's head, and cannot comprehend ideal fit is responsible for 90% of the helmet's effective protection. Things like rate sensitive foams, liquid/gel pods, and all of this other new technology are only effective if the helmet fits properly.
All hockey brands perform internal testing and then partner with other companies and universities for third party testing. The fact is, if a helmet gets CSA or HECC certification, that is genuinely all that matters. That is the standard.
Think of it this way, there are many cars on the road. They all must pass crash safety testing. However, some cars have better results than others, this could be in all categories or in select categories. Regardless, if they pass, they are approved and sold.
I like how they word this specifically:
https://driving.ca/features/safety/2023-vehicles-worst-iihs-crash-tests
"ratings don’t mean they’re unsafe, but they could be better."