Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Gummer12

2008 Beijing Olympics Thread

Recommended Posts

6 for 6 (you know who). 6 WR's.

And amazingly...still not boring.

I agree, it's never boring when he's in a race. Its also amazing when an athlete can be so dominant like Michael Phelps is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Team USA girls are getting effed here on the scores.

As if you expected anything other than a Chinese win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been conspiracy levels of bad though.

Meanwhile Chinese swimmers are all of a sudden topping their personal bests by about 1/10th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

made me laught this morning on sportscenter when the online poll was " who will win more medals, Canada or Phelps? 90% said phelps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's been conspiracy levels of bad though.

That's why I have a hard time accepting gymnastics and figure skating as sports, versus exhibitions. There are times it seems that one athlete clearly had a superior performance, but the second athlete appears to be rewarded by the judges for having paid their dues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spitz has a totally valid point though that there was no 50m freestyle in his day or else Phelps might be just trying to tie his record. I think Phelps is amazing, of course, but everyone is getting a little carried away. Swimming is one of those events where he can win all those golds because they have so many different events. LeBron or Kobe can only win one gold at most because they don't have a 6ft slam dunk, 8 ft slam dunk and 3 point contest at the Olympics. And yes freestyle is different than butterfly which is different than whatever but it's all in the pool and he's obviously a freak of nature in water.

That's a little bit like saying alpine skiing is like nordic skiing is like aerial skiing because they are all done on the snow with skis.

I think what Jesse and Carl did are just as impressive but many are ready to anoint Phelps greatest Olympian ever.

I think it's the domination over two Olympics that is so amazing. Carl gets great points for his longevity, but if Phelps is willing to put in the hard work for another four years, has an opportunity to obliterate past records.

Actually, I've always felt the most impressive performance in a single Olympics was Eric Heiden in 1980. He won the 500m, 1000m, 1500m, 5000m and 10,000m, four of them Olympic records and one a world record. I don't know what the comparison would be for track and field, but let's just say that maybe it's somewhat equivalent to winning every distance between the 100 meter dash and a 5K race. Remarkable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article from the Chicago Tribune as to why Phelps isn't the greatest Olympian of all time.

Kind of like how hockey isn't as punishing on the body as football. Football players could never play two games a day or two apart, it would destroy their bodies. It's the basic phyics of the sports. They are all great athletes, but to excel in one that destroys your body over a longer period of time is more difficult to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I refuse to agree with any article that puts two guys in boats ahead of Phelps. I can buy Lewis, that's about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started reading it...but decided it was too poorly written for me to waste my time with, since I probably would just write it off, anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dumb article. He is just placing longevity over quality.

And does anybody seriously think Phelps isn't getting at least a couple more gold medals in 2012 London?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His point was that swimming is low impact and if you're good at it there are a lot of available metals to be had for someone who is better than their piers. It gives you more oportunity to win more metals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Micheal Phelps > Philip Hersh (author of that POS article)

also, a quote from that article:

"You can't compare track and swimming. In swimming, you can recover. You can do five races in a day and get world records in all of them. That's impossible in our sport."

lol

"Three of swimming's four strokes -- everything but breaststroke -- might as well be the same." WRONG

"Nearly every good freestyler can be a good butterflyer, and vice-versa." Absolutely wrong

My guess is this guy has never swam in his life, at least not competitively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Micheal Phelps > Philip Hersh (author of that POS article)

also, a quote from that article:

"You can't compare track and swimming. In swimming, you can recover. You can do five races in a day and get world records in all of them. That's impossible in our sport."

lol

"Three of swimming's four strokes -- everything but breaststroke -- might as well be the same." WRONG

"Nearly every good freestyler can be a good butterflyer, and vice-versa." Absolutely wrong

My guess is this guy has never swam in his life, at least not competitively.

I'm not an elite athlete..and I don't even know how to swim, but I can tell that those strokes are very different and there is (obviously) a reason that the same 10 swimmers don't swim every discipline.

The track athlete who said that is an ass, IMO.

And, isn't it fact that Lewis was juiced (mind you, who wasn't then...)? Yeah, great Olympian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...