Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

marka

Members++
  • Content Count

    1394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by marka

  1. Howdy, Yet another dumb refereeing question for the group... Where in the USAH book is the language around goalie interference and when that rises to penalty level vs. just "faceoff in the neutral zone"? edit: Because the way I'm reading the book, even incidental contact with the goalie is supposed to be penalized. But in real life I know that I've seen there be no penalty, just a faceoff outside the zone. Mark
  2. Howdy, Ah, apologies. I missed the spreadsheet link. Well, that makes me feel more encouraged about thinking I might try going back to 5/8 Fire. Mark
  3. Howdy, I think you're misreading that. I think what they're saying is that a 5/8" Fire has the bite of ~3/4" and the glide of ~7/8". For me, testing them back to back I found 1/2" Fire and 5/8" ROH to be nearly indistinguishable. I've also used 5/8 Fire and now am using 3/4 Fire, but I've not done ROH above 5/8", so I can't compare the shallower Fire cuts to shallower ROHs. Mark
  4. Howdy, Honestly, this is by far the best reason to get a Sparx. Or really "your own sharpener", but I think the Sparx is the most accessible way for a home user to do their own sharpening. Being able to sharpen whenever you want without leaving the house is freaking awesome. Mark
  5. Howdy, Here or on the FB group, I can't recall someone really recommending the Pro base. And there are lots of comments about "shouldn't have gotten it". YMMV. As for your actual question re: oiling/waxing the blade prior to a last pass... I've never seen anyone recommend that. AFAIK, that's only done with a traditional grinding wheel vs. the diamond grit (?) ones that Sparx uses. I can say that it would be a bit of a pain as well. No question that for me I would use (and do use) a Speed Skate rather than that. The only thing I don't like all that much about the speed skate is that it rubs at the finish on my Shift Onyx blades. But I think that's more an issue with a fairly non-durable coating vs. the speed skate itself. Mark
  6. Howdy, One of these helps #3. https://wissota.com/product/speed-skate/ Mark
  7. Howdy, Still a $250 stick though. Hard to swallow. Wasn't the FT3 like $150? Mark
  8. Howdy, Another 7.5 Mako person here that is now using 6.5 TF7. I was using a 7.5D Mako that almost certainly should have been a 7.5EE but still seemed to work for me. The 6.5D TF7 definitely fits 'wider' and with more volume. And yes, they're also a LOT stiffer than my used Mako M8s. I never compared them to new M8's of course. YMMV, but I've been really happy with my TF7 skates. I've also got a pair of TF9's in the same size, but haven't gotten around to baking them / putting them into the rotation yet. Mark
  9. Howdy, I have no particular advise, but I would assume its going to be reasonably specific as to where you are today and what your goals are. My "I'm a computer guy, not any type of exercise expert" opinion is that with age comes things like: * a slower metabolism, so diet is even more important / you will struggle more to lose weight * slower injury recovery time * more incidence of 'cumulative stress' type things like bad joints / arthritis I've certainly experienced / am experiencing all of those (I'm 52 now). I'll be interested to hear what people say. My gut reaction is that you don't change because you're older per se... You change because something about being older makes what you were doing before not work as well. So if you're doing a bunch of strength training today and its working for you... Don't change just because the odometer rolls over to the next decade. Mark
  10. Howdy, I replied in the other thread, but just to make searching easier... 8-32, 1/2" long. I would order these if I were buying some specifically vs. just had something lying around: https://www.mcmaster.com/92210A194/ True's replacements also have blue thread locker pre-applied. Mark
  11. Howdy, Yes, just checked one of the screws. 8-32. 1/2" long (from top of flathead to the end). I would order these if I were buying some, vs. just had stuff laying around: https://www.mcmaster.com/92210A194/ Mark
  12. Howdy, Its a left handed stick, but the rest... Maybe? Mark
  13. Howdy, I'm still wondering if anyone knows how to decode the barcode sticker to confirm that this is a mid kick or anything else about it. Mark
  14. Howdy, My "I don't know very much" guess is that RY still means just what factory the stick was built in. Its just a (new?) Chinese factory. The stick weights on the sticks I just got don't like up to any retail models, as far as I can tell. They're heavier than the <400g top of the line models, but less than an AS4 non-pro or AS4 Team. Mark
  15. Howdy, Yeah. Talked to the seller. He didn't know, or was at least good at acting. I assumed when he advertised them as as4 pro construction dressed as trigger 6's that he knew what he had. We did a partial refund so I ended up getting a little money back and I'll try them out. I'm still curious if anyone knows what the "MHSRTSMSP" code means. Sounds like "SM" likely means tacks / mid-kick construction? Mark
  16. Howdy, Picked up a couple sticks on Sideline. Advertised as AS4 Pro construction. RY/80/T/S15115/V01 on the shaft. Sticker has MHSRTSMSP RICHARTZ BLAIS (T6R) S15115-01 One weighs 427 grams and the other is 417 grams. AS4 Pro retail has an advertised weight of 374 grams. What have I actually got? https://photos.app.goo.gl/W9FLouzYJXZyULDy5 https://photos.app.goo.gl/EB1pPbRuyTv3nG2s7 Mark
  17. Howdy, Depends on whether its loose or the screw is snapped. If its just loose, pull the inside foam pad out/aside and use the tool they provided with the skates to tighten up the screw. If the screw is snapped (this happened to me), then you'll need a replacement screw. True can send you some, or you can cut down a flat head hardware store screw to length. I can't remember the thread specs, but if you need them ask and I'll dig them up. Mark
  18. Howdy, Any Summer Jam folks interested at $100? Mark
  19. Howdy, How's the width/depth? I'd have said that the TF7/TF9 were both wider and deeper than 'traditional D width skates'. Same hold true with the Catalyst? Also True, this is where you sending a pair to @Hills for review might save you money on that 30 day fit guarantee... Mark
  20. Howdy, Uh... Wow. Why would you do that? That seems totally insane. PARTICULARLY if your goal is to profile. Mark
  21. Howdy, I didn't think so, no. My understanding was that the primary difference was the leg adjustment. I'd be pretty happy to be wrong though. Well, and if I'm wrong I'd like to know how the differences transfer to the JetSpeed girdle they actually make now. Mark
  22. Howdy, So, got the 9k in and played with it in a couple games this past weekend. A couple first impressions... Its annoying to not have it be a wrap style. Ended up putting on jock, then girdle without the legs, then socks, then skates, then shins, then socks fastened to jock (with is a little more irritating with the girdle in the way), then put the girdle legs in place, then pull on the shell. I might need to see if the 9k's "diaper" will fit over my skates. And maybe see if I can cut off the velcro for socks on the 9k itself, to get that out of the way of the velcro on the jock. Its also quite a bit heavier and a little more restrictive. Seems like that's the tradeoff for a decent bit more protection in front for pucks, etc. though. Not sure on the hip protection yet, but it seems like its a little better than the 7092 girdle. Still, the extra weight and more restriction is noticable. Similarly, its bulkier than the 7092. Shell fits a little tighter. I need to get used to how it sits on my hips, etc. as well. A few times it felt like maybe the shell or girdle or both were riding a little bit low. I think this is just getting used to it though. But maybe its the belt closure on the 9k being a little more finicky than the slip style one on the 7092 and not having the big velcro patch on the wrap closure. Going to keep giving it a go. Eventually I'll test out the hip protection. 🙂 My ideal girdle would have been the 7092 with with significantly better hip/tailbone protection. I'm less worried about the puck protection in the front and that's where the 9k seems to be WAY better. Maybe I'll franken mod the 7092, if the 9k doesn't work out. Mark
  23. Howdy, Yeah... Is this "July Fools"? The middle bar looks to be floating. I'd like to see some slow-mo of that puck hitting that bar. Gotta think even if nothing breaks it'll deflect back into a face. Mark
  24. Howdy, Details on how to fix? Is that just the gel coat (or whatever its called) cracking? Something else? Mark
  25. Howdy, I had a shock doctor impact hockey jock on. Didn't seem to help much. Not sure the padding was in the best place and also not sure how much 1/8" to 1/4" of generic pad helps. I've been kinda interested to try out a 9k anyway. This just put me over the edge. Mark
×
×
  • Create New...