Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

marka

Members++
  • Content Count

    1394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by marka

  1. Howdy, Yeah. This has been being talked about on FB for a couple weeks. Bummer for sure. It was the best store around Pittsburgh by a pretty large margin. Saturday was their last day as KO. They're keeping their spot at the rink in Delmont / Center Ice apparently. Never been there so I have no idea on how much retail space they have, if they're going to be able to profile steel there, if any of their expert employees are going to move to work there, etc. etc. I don't think anyone knows what Pure intends to do with the main store location in terms of having good goalie selection, profiling, keeping existing employees, or whatever like KO was known for. IIRC, hasn't Pure gone to Sparx machines across the board? If the shop at the rink is a typical pro shop type of place, this just further cements "order it online" for me. Which, to be fair, was already pretty strong. Still, KO was 1.5 hours away from me and I drove past two Pure's and a Perani's to get there when I went. Mark
  2. Howdy, How do you measure / determine if you pronate/supinate? Mark
  3. Howdy, Signed up. Looking forward to it! Mark
  4. Howdy, I think that's a pretty key assumption. And if its invalid, it may well be exactly why the helmet does poorly on impact tests. As to the assumption itself, it obviously doesn't hold up when pushed. A knit winter hat fits really, really awesomely, but I think we can all agree that it doesn't provide much protection. Until a company like CCM starts publishing internally generated impact data, the only game in town trying to quantify relative protection level is VT. Its pretty disheartening to see then being ignored by manufacturers. That's particularly true when how a helmet performs on independent impact studies could be a major advertising tool for them. There's not many parents that aren't willing to shell out another hundred if they believe you when you say their kid's head will be protected better. Mark
  5. Howdy, Are the prostock ft1's called "FT1"? I'm not seeing anything like that on PSH. Its all HGCLP, or HG12, or whatever. Mark
  6. Howdy, Thread drift alert, but I'm curious if you know typical margins on that type of thing? I've wondered a few times if a bulk buy of an equipment sale would be 'worth it'. Assuming, of course, that I could get enough of an "in" to even be in position to make something like that happen. I realize that it will vary, given the nature of one off deals and retail sale (usually with negotiation and/or auctions) to the public, just wondering if there are rules of thumb. Mark
  7. Howdy, I've tried this enough times that until someone posts high speed video or something I'm not going to believe that this is true. I've literally never seen sharpie left over after a cycle. I think its WAY more likely that the sparks/swarf from the grinding is sandblasting away the sharpie long before the wheel actually grinds the steel. Mark
  8. Howdy, Yes, I don't think the sharpie method works at all. My guess is that the sparks/swarf thrown from the grinding wipe out the sharpie long before the wheels actually hits the metal there. I've done it a few times and literally have never seen sharpie remaining regardless of the number of cycles. I've not done any microscopic analysis, but I tend to use 6 cycles when switching hollows. I can't come up with any reason that 5/8 Fire to 3/4 Fire should have given you more bite. I've done that same switch and not experienced that... My experience was what you'd expect... A little less bite and a more concerted effort needed to get onto your edge with the 3/4 Fire vs. the 5/8 Fire. I suppose maybe the 3/4 Fire ring without enough passes may have skinny-ed up the "fangs" on either side while leaving the center of the runner 'deep'? Just a guess. I would run more cycles and re-test. Mark
  9. Howdy, Oh yeah... I was going to say... I started doing checking games this year. Nothing super serious, relatively lower level Bantam stuff local to me and I filled in for a period of a high school game when there was a scheduling issue and I was at the rink for a previous game. That wasn't nearly as big a jump as I thought it was going to be at least in the handful of games I've done so far. In hindsight its not all that surprising... Its still the same game and there's lots of restrictions on how you hit someone. The high school game I filled in for was one of the most fun games I've done so far... National anthem to start, being announced as an official, having penalty calls and goals announced, etc. Kinda takes it to another level to know that they're going to announce what you called / who you gave that 2nd assist to! 🙂 Mark
  10. Howdy, Interesting to look back on this post from three years ago. Things have definitely changed... 🙂 Looking back at my log sheet for this year and I ended up doing almost exactly the same number of "IRS games" as I did in 2019... 115 this year to 116 the year I started. Of course, due to the virus I ended up doing those games from May to now vs. across the whole year so in actuality I was reffing a lot more often. I don't track the one-off cash games, but I would guess that I did quite a few more of those this year vs. in 2019 as well. Its pretty crazy the difference between the gross income vs. actual net income... This year I grossed ~$5700 across those 115 games, but netted less than half that at ~$2200. Mileage and tolls were by far the biggest expense at ~$2500 (not helped that I ref a lot at a rink ~45 miles away), but a skate purchase, ref seminar, jerseys/pants, etc. etc. too... It all adds up. Occasionally I talk to another ref that doesn't bother to track that stuff for whatever reason, but doing a Schedule C is pretty darned easy and keeping a log is not at all hard... Saving $1k+ or whatever tax wise is a good thing. That's all just focusing on the financial side, of course. Which certainly has an impact in why I ref, but I don't actually 'need' that money. Still, its really nice to be able to pay for my beer league hockey (and glove, jersey, and sock) addiction and get paid to exercise. But there's non-financial incentives as well... I've seen some REALLY good hockey, both with adults in beer league and kids. Its just impressive being on the ice with the A level beer league guys that used to play 'real' hockey and marvel at how they basically never have to look at the puck, fly around the ice, seem to already know where everyone is, and that any time the puck comes to withing 4' of them they control it regardless of whether its on the ice or not. And then there's the elite kids... Nothing like reffing a 10U game with the 2nd and 3rd ranked teams in the country. Its like seeing a half-sized NHL game. The less skilled stuff is often fun for other reasons... The kid stuff is great, seeing all different levels out there trying hard and having fun from ADM "cluster of kids all chasing the puck" on half ice (I don't do many of these though, since they're good games for young refs) to non-elite older players. Those kids will probably never be superstars or whatever, but they're still out there doing a good job and having fun playing a game with their team. Most of the coaches and parents, the overwhelming majority, seem to get it as well. The less skilled adult games I ref are often people I know from playing, or just from reffing a lot. Even if the hockey doesn't blow me away, its still fun to be out there skating, catching up with friends, etc. Those slower games are also a great chance to work on some edgework. 🙂 The other refs have been good to get to know as well. What a cross section of folks! All income / professional levels, people that have been involved in hockey since they were 5, people that started just a few years ago, etc. Its a little bit of a bummer that its literally all white guys, but it is what it is. At least at the reffing seminars you see some diversity and its great to see women getting publicity reffing at some higher levels so I'm sure this will improve. Still, that doesn't take away from me liking the folks I'm out there reffing with. I didn't really start this out to be the long rambling thing its become, so I'll cut it off. Reffing has been a real net positive for me. It can be easy to listen to the problems and watch the youtube videos and forget that nearly everyone in the rink is there for the right reasons. Not that its all been roses... This season I had to wash blood out of my jersey from a fight, I've been told in pretty explicit ways just how horrible I am as a ref and a person, I've made some really horrible calls / non-calls, etc. etc. That stuff happens. But its (by far) the minority. Mostly people at the hockey rink are there to have fun playing hockey. I like that. I like being part of that. Mark
  11. Howdy, MHO, but the point of a cross grind wheel / station is to use a more aggressive abrasive to remove material faster (with a correspondingly rougher finish). Assuming that the normal Sparx rings all use the same abrasive (which I think is the case), I don't see any benefit to using a really flat ring vs. your normal ring. If you happen to have other rings that you won't be using anyway, then sure, burn those up for 10+ cycles to remove dings, but if you're going to be buying rings anyway, just use the normal ones. The other option is to get the pro unit that they sell actual cross grind rings for. At least until someone hacks the chip or whatever and enables the use of the pro cross grind rings on a home unit. Mark
  12. Howdy, Yeah, I could really use a curve that helps my decision making. Mark
  13. Howdy, I mean, maybe that's a reason. But there's what, maybe $30 of materials in a $300 stick? I don't think "lots of warranty replacements" is the main price driver here. Mark
  14. Howdy, Now I'm wondering how many hockey sticks are sold per year vs. gaming systems... 🙂 And "because people will pay it" seems to be the answer. Mark
  15. Howdy, Since we're talking about tape now... Question I've had... For Howies, are all their tapes from the same manufacturer? Or are like the patterned tapes or whatever from a different supplier? I'd notice what I thought were differences between some patterned stuff from them vs. the basic white or black, but I'm also not sure if that's just in my head. Mark
  16. Howdy, So preheat oven to 180 deg shut off oven, and put in skates on a towel, on a cookie sheet, middle rack wait 10 (?) minutes.. The time to use seems to be all over the map? remove skates and fit ? Figuring I'll just do one at a time. I have a hard time believing the oven will maintain 180 deg for 10+ minutes without being on, particularly with opening it to put the skates in. Gas oven, with a bottom burner (when in 'bake' mode). Is it really the end of the world to leave the oven on to maintain temp? Mark
  17. Howdy, Going to rebake my TF7's finally. Someone remind me of the oven procedure for a conventional home "non-convection" oven? Mark
  18. Howdy, That's a good find. I'd checked IW, Monkey, and Pure, IIRC. Yeesh. They show 3 across all their stores. I wonder what the chances are that they'll have them when I'm actually ready to buy some? I'd been looking mostly just to see if there were any clearance sticks, didn't find any, then decided to check full retail stuff and was surprised that they didn't seem to be out there. Mark
  19. Howdy, I was looking around a bit and I can't seem to find an FT4 or FT4 pro at the moment in a left, 75 flex, P90TM. Is this another pattern like the P30 that CCM is going to convince me I like, then discontinue it? Mark
  20. Howdy, No, I'm just an idiot and said it wrong. Fixed in the original post. My impression has always been that the 7092 and ST girdles are very similar protection wise, with the 7092 version being a wrap style without leg pad height adjustment and the ST having a diaper w/height adjust. Mark
  21. Howdy, This is the first I've heard of the Tacks 7092 girdle being way less protective than the Super Tacks girdle... Just surprising. I have the 7092 girdle and I'd have said that I felt more protected in it than anything else I've used outside of some Easton Pro 15 pants (that are TANKS and weigh about twice as much). Mark
  22. Howdy, IW's black friday 15% off applies to new True skates. I'm only about 6 months into my TF7s and they still look mostly new, but I'm tempted to pick up another pair at $280! Mark
  23. Howdy, So is the Benn Pro the same thing as CCM's retail P90TM? If not, what is? Mark
  24. Howdy, For playing or coaching? For playing, I tried both the UA ear loop mask as well as the CCM cage attached mask. I used the UA with a cage (so obviously no fogging problems) and the CCM mask with a bauer concept 3 / whatever fishbowl. No fogging problems with the CCM mask. As mentioned, I noticed hot wetness on my face with both because of trapped sweat, which was one of those "sorta annoying, but otherwise doesn't seem to affect me" things. For wearing to coach on the ice, I'd try the UA mask with a helmet without a shield just to ensure no fogging issues. But... Not sure if no shield is allowed? The UA mask, to me, does as good a job of moisture management as anything else does and better than most. In terms of "can people hear me"... I think masks don't actually muffle people very much but we all think they do... Just force yourself to use it / not pull it down to talk loudly and you'll get used to it. Easy for me to say though, given that I'm not on the ice coaching. Around here (eastern OH, western PA), masks aren't required and even though I mask up everywhere else, I don't wear one on the ice as a player or a ref. My view on mask usage in those situations is that its much more about "knocking down particulates you exhale" vs. "filtering air you inhale" so since nobody else is wearing one, it seems a little pointless for me to. But who knows, maybe all the other people there are thinking the same thing... Mark
  25. Howdy, I tend to agree, at least with the "don't be afraid to say that you don't like something you've tried" idea. My take is that you likely shouldn't ignore that a different profile may help, but also be comfortable with the idea of discarding changes that don't work / don't show promise fairly quickly. I might be inclined to stick with something a little longer if there's a skating coach or something working directly with your son who's making the recommendations and can explain why, but if its just "the MSH forum guys love the 0.5 quad profile" like it sounds like... Give it a try and if you don't like it, move on. Mark
×
×
  • Create New...