Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/24/21 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    You've overstepped. I don't think anyone brought into question your profession or academic ability. Don't fight dirty just because you aren't getting the result you want from the case you are laying out. Instead, look at the case and adjust. You obviously haven't laid out a compelling enough case. As for the video - the dude is a resident. Since you seem to like to explain things that don't need explaining, let me explain. He is still in training. Has graduated medical school (good for him) and is now working as a physician under the supervision of more experienced personnel while he continues to gain knowledge and experience. He also talks a lot in maybes (like you have). Maybe the puck hit the neck and severed the artery. Maybe it fractured the temporal bone. maybe, maybe, maybe. He has no data, no evidence, no facts to hang his argument on. And like you, even hypothesized that a full cage might have mitigated the injury, but probably not. To his benefit he makes the obvious statement that 100s of thousands if not millions of folks have likely been hit with a puck in a similar area of the head, with very few (if any) of them seeing the catastrophic outcome this young man did. I think the point has been made before, we can't eliminate risk, only hope to mitigate it. Maybe a better helmet design could further mitigate the risk of this case, but the question is "is it worth the effort considering how prevalent serious injury is?" That is the question CCM and Bauer and Warrior are all asking themselves right now. What is the Return on Investment if we explore designing a safer helmet to mitigate these types of injuries? Considering the amount of merger and acquisition we've seen in the hockey equipment world over the last 20 years, I have to imagine margins for most equipment is razor thin. Throwing a ton of money into a new helmet design would make those margins even thinner and could potentially sink a company if they aren't careful with how they approach it. Hate to break it to you, but at the end of the day, staying in business is their top priority, your safety is further down on their list.
  2. 3 points
    So one thing has become become clear, there should be a huge market for helmets to protect against long-term brain injuries similar to what must have happened when your mother dropped you on your head, they should sell by the truckload. Bowing out of this shit show.
  3. 2 points
    Damn. Sorry guys. I wouldn't have posted that video if I knew it was going to create a new firestorm. I posted it just to give more info on the incident. IMHO, that video is not one sided, and information should not be cherry picked out of it to support one's argument. If anything, that entire video says, it's great if we can improve helmet safety, but we can't protect everyone from everything, and that there is an assumed risk in playing sports like hockey.
  4. 2 points
    The main issue with this thread is that @Deker asked a valid question but with a foregone conclusion. Then he basically entered the argument in bad faith. In no way was this ever a discussion, more just that he wanted validation of his opinion/stance. I see this all the time now because it's so easy to find something on the internet that loosely supports their argument.
  5. 1 point
    I have not. I still have 2 pairs of Shift 2s and 4 pairs of Verberos. Seems like Verberos don't get alot of love, but it's very stiff and very moldable. There are a few guys here that have gone from Kor to Makos to VH/True. Maybe they can chime in or PM you.
  6. 1 point
    Napoleon was actually of average or slightly above average height for his day. 5’2” is his commonly cited height. But that’s in French units, which converts to about 5’6” in Imperial. What about this?
  7. 1 point
  8. 1 point
    T Blabes and a Mirrored Visor. Yup... I was that guy...
  9. 1 point
    @Deker you are literally the poster child for why the internet is such a black hole for mature dialogue. -You know nothing about risk assessment -You know nothing about product management -You know nothing about business cases Yet you keep cutting and pasting the same arguments (feeble as they may be) and now have resorted to name calling because people disagree with you. People who know more than you about the topic. Since you are so infatuated with cups, I assume you wear that fancy carbon fiber one the pros switched to after Molina had his injury? How much of the general sports population wears that? If you are so convinced there is a market for this, then run with it. Come up with a business plan, do some basic prototyping, it's cheap as hell now with 3D printing and there are workspaces everywhere for startups. Throw it up on Kickstarter and follow your dream. Put you money where your mouth is and quit acting like an immature brat.
  10. 1 point
    Do you have a script so I can buy one off you?



×
×
  • Create New...