Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

215BroadStBullies610

Members++
  • Content Count

    1574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by 215BroadStBullies610

  1. Legit point. And it looks the 3rd year of Patty's deal COULD be an issue when it comes time to pay the young boys. By that time, the cap ceiling could be higher and other players could be moved.
  2. Wow. When I first saw this, I had the same response you two had haha. I don't get it. Especially at the AAV. Well, I'd have to imagine JVR is on the move.
  3. Haha I like that. I hear ya. We shall see. It's going to take much more from the Flyers before I buy in 100%.
  4. The Sabres have traded forwards Marcus Foligno and Tyler Ennis to the Minnesota Wild for Marco Scandella and Jason Pominville. The Wild also get the Sabres' third-round pick in next year's draft (2018), while the Sabres get Minnesota's fourth-round selection (2018). This will be interesting to see if we see more trades like this in the next couple of days...
  5. Hmm. Interesting. Maybe Vegas knew that OTT wouldn't bother giving any comp. for protection.
  6. Agreed. There is no rush for Vegas to be good NOW. Build through the draft and free agents will come in due time.
  7. Poor is a bit of stretch (and by no means am I a Kool-Aid drinker). While I also disagreed with the Morgan Frost pick, no way we can know if it is indeed 'horrific.' What do know that Schenn's cap hit is bigger than Lehtera ($5.125M vs. $4.7M). Lehtera's contract ends one year sooner than Schenn's (2018-19 vs. 2019-20). While Schenn was 3rd on the Flyers in pts, 55, and 2nd in goals, 25, 50.9% of his points came on the PP (17 G, 11 A). Last time I checked, no team spent half the season on the PP. He was a PP specialist who didn't put up a ton a goals. Add on top of that, he's listed as a 'C' who mainly played 'LW.' What does that mean? He was somewhat of a defensive liability. The Flyers can get up to 2 additional picks. Per Elliotte Friedman: Conditions on second pick from STL to PHI: top 10 protected, STL has option to push to 2019. If they do so, PHI also gets a third in 2020. That 'second pick' is right now slated as a 2018 1st rounder. The Umberger-Hartnell trade was similar in the fact that the cap hits were almost identical but Umberger's contract ended sooner. Flipula's trade allowed the Flyers to move Streit and (hopefully) provide more room for one of the younger blue liners to come up from juniors/LVP. I feel you in regards to your frustration. I'd say we, us Flyers fans, need to let it play out.
  8. I agree with your OTT point. As with Vegas, we have to remember that it is a new franchise. Mgmt should be as focused on now as it should be on the future. While the pick isn't till 2020, I'm sure McPhee and his people knew that the could get a 'flip-able' player. I don't know if Vegas ever had any intention of keeping him. So to get a 2nd draft pick for a 32 year old defensive d-man isn't too bad. At least that's how I see it.
  9. Yea, you live in a richer demographic than I do ha. I was at the local outlets so its not surprising to see rich people and their rich people toys haha. Teslas are out and about at almost every rink during the youth season. Those 'AAA' parents can ride in style ha.
  10. He was 20th out of 21 goalies selected in the draft. One of 2 goalies selected in the 7th. I have no idea who Ferguson is ha. All I know is if you are selected in the 7th round of any modern-day NHL draft, you're not considered a 'high' prospect. He may surprise us all. I wouldn't hold my breath.
  11. I saw one in person last week. The i8 is a beautiful vehicle!
  12. The Flyers traded Brayden Schenn to the St. Louis Blues for the 27th pick (Morgan Frost), Jori Lehtera and a conditional first-round pick in 2018 during the 1st Round of the 2017 NHL Draft. https://www.nhl.com/news/flyers-deal-brayden-schenn-to-blues-for-jori-lehtera-picks/c-290097928?tid=278542340 A little late on my part but figured it is worth putting out here. I like the trade overall. I was hoping that the Flyers would have taken a chance on either Tolvanen or Kostin but I can't bash the Frost pick.
  13. That's a bit of a stretch, eh ha? That being said, Vegas was expected to move Methot after the expansion draft. Given that he has a 10-team NTC, the deal seems pretty reasonable on both ends.
  14. Yea, I can see that. A little bit of difference I'd say haha.
  15. Derek Stepan, Antti Raanta traded to Coyotes by Rangers. Arizona acquires center, goalie from New York for defenseman Anthony DeAngelo, No. 7 pick in 2017 NHL Draft. It looks like the Rangers are selling some what high here. DeAngelo gets to, essentially, come back home. Stepan seemed to trend downward as the season when on last year. DeAngelo has shown offensive promise but still somewhat of defensive liability. Fun stuff leading up to tonight's draft.
  16. I'll be interesting to see how it works out. From a financially standpoint, it seems to pretty much even. Is Saad a safety net for Toews? Paranin should fit in nicely with CBJ. I just wonder who set him up like Patty K.
  17. I've been told you can replace the tires in pairs. I wouldn't but I know people who have and haven't had any problems.
  18. Oh okay. Thanks for the insight. Well, I know TB is hurting for defensive prospects/youth so I have to imagine that Sergachev will be given every opportunity to stay with the main club. Drouin is exciting and looks to be primed to shine in the NHL (given that he can handle the pressure in MTL). And I was thinking that either Galchenyuk or Radulov would be the odd man out up front. What you say about Gally makes more sense though.
  19. Wow. Off of @CandiansMTL - "The Canadiens acquire Jonathan Drouin + a cond. 6th-round pick (2018) from TBL, in return for M. Sergachev + a cond. 2nd-round pick (2018)." Interesting.
  20. Another contribution for the people. Schedule has been really busy but I feel these equipment reviews are important to help each other out. About Me: I've graduated from the original Mako skates and overall was impressed enough to stay with Easton and use the Mako II's (my only pair of skates now). Player Specs: 5' 11"....210 lbs....Men's B league...Forward/Defenseman Size: 9.5D Playing time: I play for one team (I was playing with 2 until we folded for Fall/Winter '17). I coach two teams but only can make practices for the travel team (1-2 practices per week). I participate in pickup hockey/Shinny USA (1-2 ice sessions per week). I officiate youth (travel and scholastic), Juniors (Tier III), ACHA and adult league (??? games a week haha). Safe to say I'm on the ice a lot, eh? Usage: Since April 2016. Aesthetics: Big fan of how the Mako II looks! The originals weren't pleasant to the eye at all haha. These one look sleek and professional. I'm glad Easton made skates that I felt comfortable wearing not matter what my current position/role is anytime I step on the ice. 10/10 Blade/Holder: I've swapped out the CXN/ES4 stock combo for the LS Tuuk/LS4 pair. Love addition but since isn't OEM for the Mako IIs, I'll pass on any grade/review. *N/A Fit & Break-in Period: With my first pair of Makos, I loved the fit, post-bake. So when I had a chance to upgrade to the Mako IIs, I felt no need to change from my 9.5D sizing. That was a mistake haha. It took me months to break these bad boys in (while I felt at home after one skate with my original Makos). I have to imagine this is due to the reinforced boot? (Sorry for the limited knowledge). I had bad blister on my right heel during this break-in period (which is a non-issue now). It was a complete 180 degree difference in comparison to my first Makos. Now, I still do wear my Mako IIs and will continue to do so till I find a worthy replacement (I really am a big fan of the Mako fit). I think I was better off going with 'EE' width and maybe moving up 1/2 size. The toe box for the Mako IIs crams my toes on both feet for me. My inside arches, specifically on my right foot, didn't have as much rooms as I would have wanted to have. My feet can tolerate them when I play. Officiating/Coaching though cause discomfort that I didn't experience with the originals. 7/10 Durability: Overall, Easton has improved in this area. My boot has held up MUCH better than my first pair of Makos. Considering that I'm not a light gut AND these are my only pair of skates, I'm impressed on the boot's ability to weather wear and tear. Only at my right inside arch is the noticeable cracking/peeling of the boot's material. The stock rivets will still come out easily but I've had cooper rivets put in as replacements. 9/10 Performance: No complaints here. The aggressive stance suits my skating style. The skate breaths well. There hasn't been anything to date that has compromised the way I've expected this skate to perform. 10/10 Weight: Similar to the original Makos, they aren't the lightest skates but they do the trick. With snug fit and the LS Tuuks, I don't have any issues when it comes to weight. 10/10 Overall: I was a fan of this Easton skate before I got the Mako II and it hasn't changed since. I put it on myself for not looking for a better fitting pair of Mako II's so I can't blame Easton for that. I like what Easton has done with this second addition of the Mako skate. Who knows what the future will hold. What I do know is that I would buy the Mako II again and recommend these to anyone. Enjoy. 46/50 = 9.2/10
×
×
  • Create New...