If this product is indeed in the early stages of R&D, then it should price adjusted accordingly. The standard set at the $800 mark by other companies is high. Therefore, when you charge at the standard, and you don't meet it, you fail. Check any product by Bauer, CCM or Easton that has a price at $800+. Chances are you're not going to see any blemishes. Why? Because any blemishes on a high-end skate, no matter how small, reflects poorly on the company. The company attached their logo to their product and is stating, "This is our final product to you, the consumer." This is why if any blemishes are noted, you'll often see them at discount, as such: http://www.modsquadhockey.com/forums/index.php/topic/63192-20k-skates-cosmetic-defects/ For those that don't want to click: Again, there's an industry standard. If Scott charges at the price, why shouldn't a consumer expect the standard already set? If anything there should be no excuse for sub-standard work being placed into a consumer hands. No matter how minor and insignificant. It reflects poorly on his company and says: "We sell you a new item with cosmetic defects at $850 and expect you to fix our mistakes." That doesn't happen folks. If it did, the company wouldn't be around for very long. Another way to think about it is: Junkyard wants to compete against Reebok by creating jerseys for consumers. If Junkyard does not meet and/or exceed the standard set by Reebok, Junkyard won't be able to compete at the same price structure. Simple as that. In other words, I WANT VH FOOTWEAR TO SUCCEED AND MAKE AWESOME PRODUCTS. However, they should work on their quality control. Because most consumers won't accept a sub-standard product at a premium price.