sturdy22

left to right. P92, Pro97, Easton Iginla - not the best angle on the Easton.

No. Same size as the senior Iginla (little longer) with a lower lie.

I have one also. Curve is like a flatter P92/W03 with the blade shape of the Easton Iginla.

The 34 is very straight through the heel. Angle and lighting of the pic makes it look more like the 92 but it doesn’t play like the 92.

I have the PRO 34 in the old 3rd line. Never liked the curve and it’s collecting dust at the moment but I might give it another chance on a new sport court rink that just reopened near me. Heel is flat with a curve at the toe and the blade shape is similar to the P28. attached is a picture (left to right)of the PRO34, P92 and PRO28

I am also an Easton CXN runner and holder user. I have several pairs of makos that I rotate and I also have extra Easton holders/runners I put on my trues. I am Interested in the new Warrior skates also. I have tried several different quads and duals on Tuuks but I haven’t found one that lands and gives me the on my toes feeling. I have found that a single radius (9’ or 10’) with an aggressive forward pitch on tuuk runners is pretty close to the pitch on the Easton runners. Not perfect but close enough that you’ll adjust pretty quick. I have also used 3mm lifts between the holder and boot on Tuuks with a single radius as a cheaper alternative. I have my own riveter so I am able to change holders and lifts easily.

I just got the 1910 delivered last night. It is the closest curve to the P106 I have found. It opens up a little more and the blade shape is different but it’s a great playing curve for those that remember the P106 from back in the day. I still have some blades I’ve been saving so it’s nice to have a one piece option now.

I like it. It’s the third line so it’s over all a heavier stick but it plays a lot lighter. I tend to lean more towards heels but this is a good blend of a slight heel into a slight toe.

Being an avid user of the P106 and P89 I agree With your description of the 1616. I still have P106 and P89 blades that I’m saving and went with the 1616 because of the comparison to the 106 in the description. I have A bunch of PROs and I really Like the 1616 and have been using it for about a year over the others. my son just got a 1910 in a righty so I can’t use it but it’s a nice curve and I think it will be my next purchase.

I have reached out to Per and from what I understand the upper is the same as the R1 and the lower is interchangeable with the R1 and R1 inserts. The O2 comes with a 4’ radius insert which is equivalent to the Current O1. As a user of the O1 and the R1, I am looking forward to a chassis only version being available. I like what Marsblade is doing with the product.

I have used a kit from Amazon to repair a significantly cracked True boot. The kit (True Composites) comes with a sheet of composite fabric a bottle of epoxy resin and a bottle of hardener. I did the repair last year and the boot has held up perfectly. You would only need to mix a little of the resin and hardener to cover the area of concern. https://a.co/d/d0Bzp0j

Yes same hole pattern

Add Marsblade i2, CCM SB 4.0 and Easton CXN (if you can find them)