chippa13

What, we haven't moved on to simply critiquing content rather than discussing the series?

Aren't you late for a venting spot post about how some company, car, or other such shit disappointed you?

Tying goal never should have happened. If that missed trip on McAvoy was a play the other way people on this site would have lost their shit.

Donato will finally be in the lineup. Adding that skill could be just the thing to help them 5 on 5 as they'll have plenty of that skill up and down the lineup.

For a second I thought that post had a different author. As for the officiating, I'm still praying for consistency, from game to game and from period to period. Pastrnak getting 4 minutes for the high stick that wasn't in game 2 and then no call being made last night on the swipe right across Chara's face kind of peeved me a little. My favorite Pierre moment came last night when he was talking about Marchand's slashing penalty. Pierre was admonishing Marchand because of the zero tolerance slash which will always be called and then the producers decide to show the Stralman chop from game 2 on Marchand that wasn't called. As for this series, if the Bruins can't find a way to come out with better starts and generate some 5 on 5 goals then this thing will be over right quick.

Spotting them 2 goals in the first 4 minutes isn't exactly a recipe for success.

He has actually had a rather clean record but I do think this will result in a game. If he kept coming with his right shoulder it would have been fine but when he twisted to lead with his left and made direct contact with the jaw, that is where he screwed up. Concussions may occur without main point of contact to the head but broken jaws do not.

Some people just have to get the last word.

Oh, for Chist's sake, I think this has run its course.

I actually hated the "own highstick" call that put them down for 4 minutes more. There have been tough calls all over the place. I think the Pens got robbed of a goal Sunday because the ref was way too slow in getting to the net.

We're not saying an elite goalie is all a team needs.

This isn't basketball. The team with the best player in hockey doesn't always win.Goalies that are in the conversation of the elite group get their teams higher in the standings and deeper into the playoffs.

Try to lose that extra stick handle and get the puck in a shooting position earlier. It will give you more options.

When the overwhelming concensus of impartial folks call out the officiating then, as they say, where there's smoke there's fire. At least I didn't have to suffer through Emrick tonight so there's a silver lining.

Sure helps when you get the 4 minute high stick that wasn't and a play that was a slash all year long that takes away a scoring chance doesn't get called. I think I saw Stamkos on a milk carton.

The 2017 season was the first season in the last 6 that didn't have a goalie place in the Vezina voting appear in the Stanley Cup Finals. 2012: Kings beat Devils, Quick was 2nd in Vezina voting 2013: Hawks beat Bruins, Emery (7th)/Crawford (8th) vs Rask (5th) 2014: Kings beat Rangers, Quick (5th) Lundqvist (6th) 2015: Hawks beat Lightning, Crawford (6th) 2016 Pens beat Sharks, Jones (8th) Having a goalie in the Vezina conversation doesn't guarantee you a trip to the Finals but it gives you a hell of a lot better chance of getting there.

And yet the 3 Vezina finalists are still playing.........

Nobody expected this result in game 1. Was Stamkos even in the building?

Can't wait to see all the detractors railing against the Bauer holder system.

Interchangeable? No. There is a huge difference between the elites and the rest. Confidence in your goaltender to stop the ones he should and bail you out is enormous. It lets players do their jobs instead of do anything to prevent a shot. Yes, a team needs balance but a goalie on a run can take a team further than any other streaking player.

"Goaltending is sort of irrelevant........." I stopped reading there.

You could basically say the same thing about every team in the playoffs. Goaltending is a huge factor. Teams might be able to overcome a faltering goaltender for short stretches (witness: Bruins) but it always catches up to them.

There are 2 ways teams can come off of the long layoff that these teams had; rested and hungry or tight and rusty. Last night we saw both.

It will be a short leash against Tampa or it will be a short series.

A young team got farther than even their coach expected in this series. They add a little veteran presence on the blue line and get another year older and they'll make a push next year. DeBrusk really showed something in this series.